“资源-能力-关系”框架下网络能力与科技企业孵化器服务创新绩效研究——知识积累的中介作用与知识基的调节作用

被引：22

作者：

姜骞 ^{[1
]}

唐震 ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] 辽宁工业大学管理学院

[2] 不详

来源：

科技进步与对策 | 2018年 / 35卷 / 05期

关键词：

网络能力; 知识积累; 知识基; 科技企业孵化器; 服务创新绩效;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

F273.1 [企业技术管理];

学科分类号：

摘要：

以资源基础理论、组织学习理论、组织间关系理论及网络能力理论为基础,构建"资源-能力-关系"框架下网络能力、知识积累、知识基与科技企业孵化器服务创新绩效概念框架并提出研究假设,通过大样本数据调查,运用SPSS、Amos软件对概念框架进行信效度检验和结构方程模型分析。结果显示,网络能力(网络资源拼凑能力、网络组织学习能力和网络关系交互能力)对知识积累具有显著正向影响;知识积累与科技企业孵化器服务创新绩效之间具有显著正相关关系,知识基对知识积累与科技企业孵化器服务创新绩效关系具有显著正向调节作用。

引用

页码：126 / 133

页数：8

共 24 条

[1] Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge.[J].Sarfraz Mian;Wadid Lamine;Alain Fayolle.Technovation.2016,
[2] What matters in business incubation? A literature review and a suggestion for situated theorising
Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas
Kakabadse, Nada K.
McGowan, Carmel
[J]. JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 21 (04) : 602 - +
[3] Emerging Economy Copycats: Capability; Environment; and Strategy.[J]..Academy of Management Perspectives.2011, 2
[4] The Entrenchment Problem; Corporate Governance Mechanisms; and Firm Value *.[J].MIKKO ZERNI;JUHA‐PEKKA KALLUNKI;HENRIK NILSSON.Contemporary Accounting Research.2010, 4
[5] Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box
Sirmon, David G.
Hitt, Michael A.
Ireland, R. Duane
[J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (01) : 273 - 292
[6] Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters.[J]..Research Policy.2005, 8
[7] Factors that play a role in "managing through measures".[J].Monica Franco;Mike Bourne.Management Decision.2003, 8
[8] Network competence.[J].Thomas Ritter;Hans Georg Gemünden.Journal of Business Research.2003, 9
[9] Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities
McEvily, B
Zaheer, A
[J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 20 (12) : 1133 - 1156
[10] The role of knowledge bases in complex product systems: Some empirical evidence from the aero engine industry
Paoli M.
Prencipe A.
[J]. Journal of Management and Governance, 1999, 3 (2) : 137 - 160

← 1 2 3 →