垂直专业化与危机中的贸易下滑

被引：21

作者：

倪红福 ^{[1
]}

夏杰长 ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] 中国社会科学院财经战略研究院服务经济研究室

[2] 中国社会科学院财经战略研究院

来源：

世界经济 | 2016年 / 39卷 / 04期

关键词：

中间产品贸易; 垂直专业化; 全球投入产出模型; 增加值贸易;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

F746 [世界进出口贸易概况];

学科分类号：

摘要：

本文通过全球投入产出模型研究发现:若全球生产网络体系正常运转,垂直关联并没有放大外生最终需求冲击对全球贸易下滑的影响,反而在一定程度上缓解了全球贸易下滑。中间产品贸易的下降幅度远低于最终需求产品贸易,但因权重为2/3,其贡献率较大(49%以上);非垂直专业化值与垂直专业化值的下降幅度基本一致,因后者权重较小,其对全球贸易的贡献率低于28%。进一步比较真实统计数据计算结果表明:一旦供给侧遭到外生冲击,全球生产网络体系遭到破坏,垂直关联中断,将导致中间产品贸易和垂直专业化贸易大幅下降,进而造成全球贸易大幅下滑。

引用

页码：95 / 119

页数：25

共 10 条

[1] An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Database: the Case of Global Automotive Production[J] . Marcel P. Timmer,Erik Dietzenbacher,Bart Los,Robert Stehrer,Gaaitzen J. Vries.Review of International Economics . 2015 (3)
[2] Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports
Koopman, Robert
Wang, Zhi
Wei, Shang-Jin
[J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (02) : 459 - 494
[3] Off the cliff and back? Credit conditions and international trade during the global financial crisis[J] . Davin Chor,Kalina Manova.Journal of International Economics . 2011 (1)
[4] Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added[J] . Robert C. Johnson,Guillermo Noguera.Journal of International Economics . 2011 (2)
[5] Vertical Linkages and the Collapse of Global Trade
Bems, Rudolfs
Johnson, Robert C.
Yi, Kei-Mu
[J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (03) : 308 - 312
[6] Inventories, Lumpy Trade, and Large Devaluations[J] . George Alessandria,Joseph P. Kaboski,Virgiliu Midrigan.The American Economic Review . 2010 (5)
[7] Collapse in World Trade[J] . Anonymous.The International Economy . 2009 (2)
[8] DEFLATION OF INPUT‐OUTPUT TABLES FROM THE USER'S POINT OF VIEW: A HEURISTIC APPROACH[J] . ErikDietzenbacher,Alex R.Hoen.Review of Income and Wealth . 2005 (1)
[9] Can vertical specialization explain the growth of world trade?
Yi, KM
[J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2003, 111 (01) : 52 - 102
[10] The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade
Hummels, D
Ishii, J
Yi, KM
[J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 54 (01) : 75 - 96

← 1 →