酷刑合法化问题研究

被引:1
作者
解梦菲
机构
[1] 北京大学法学院
关键词
酷刑合法化; 禁止攻击无防御者; 酷刑有效性; 定时炸弹假设;
D O I
10.16064/j.cnki.cn34-1003/g0.2012.04.026
中图分类号
D997.9 [国际刑法];
学科分类号
摘要
禁止酷刑及其他残忍、不人道或有辱人格的待遇或处罚是国际法的重要内容,任何国家在任何情况下均不得违反。酷刑合法化在理论和实践上都无法找到其法律依据。酷刑因违反禁止攻击无防御者的基本原则而与战争等合法谋杀具有相异的本质属性。从经验总结和科学分析来看,酷刑并不具有明显优越于普通审讯的效果。危急情况下酷刑应当被合法使用的定时炸弹假设由于存在明显的理论缺陷和实践困难亦不能作为酷刑合法化的依据。
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 126
页数:5
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Jordan J.Paust.Above the Law:Unlawful Exec-utive Authorizations Regarding Detainee Treatment,Secret Renditions,Domestic Spying,and Claims toUnchecked Executive Power. UtahL.Rev . 2007
[2]  
Eric A Posner,Adrian Vermeule.ShouldCoercive Interrogation Be Legal. Mich.L.Rev .
[3]  
Greenberg, Jeff,Pyszczynski, Tom,Solomon, Sheldon,Rosenblatt,Abram,Veeder, Mit chell,Kirkland, Shari,Lyon, Deborah.Evidence for terror management theory II:The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality . 1990
[4]  
Mirko Bagaric,Julie Clarke.Not EnoughOfficial Torture in the World?The Circumstances inWhich Torture Is Morally Justifiable. U.S.F.L.Rev .
[5]  
Hoffman,B.Anasty business. The Atlantic Monthly . 2002
[6]  
Amnesty International.Amnesty International Report2003. .
[7]  
U.N.Comm.Against Torture.Consideration of Re-ports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 19of the Convention. Second Periodic Reports of StatesParties Due in 1996 . 1997