系统综述和荟萃分析优先报告的条目:PRISMA声明

被引:48
作者
David Moher [1 ]
Alessandro Liberati [2 ,3 ]
Jennifer Tetzlaff [4 ]
Douglas G.Altman [5 ]
The PRISMA Group
机构
[1] Ottawa Methods Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
[2] Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia
[3] Centro Cochrane Italiano, Istituto Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri
[4] Ottawa Methods Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa
[5] Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford
关键词
系统综述; 荟萃分析; PRISMA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-5 [];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
为了提高系统综述和荟萃分析文章报告的质量,2009年由国际著名专家组成的系统综述和荟萃分析优先报告的条目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)小组在国际重要医学期刊包括《英国医学杂志》、《临床流行病学杂志》、《内科学年鉴》和美国《公共科学图书馆医学杂志》等同步发表了《系统综述与荟萃分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明》。该标准的制定对于改进和提高系统综述和荟萃分析的报告质量将起到重要作用。该声明较以往制定的《随机对照试验荟萃分析报告质量》(Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analyses),即《QUOROM声明》更加全面、完善。由于近年采国内外对系统综述的高度重视,发表的文章数量也越来越多,因此,有必要规范报告的标准,提高报告的质量。这份声明对系统综述和荟萃分析类文章报告的27个条目及流程图进行了定义和介绍,对相关条目进行了详细的解释和说明。及时向国内读者和临床试验研究人员介绍该声明具有重要的现实意义和学术价值。北京中医药大学循证医学中心刘建平等在第一时间内翻译了该声明,本刊希望通过介绍中文版《系统综述与荟萃分析优先报告的条目:PRISMA声明》,以进一步提高国内系统综述文章撰写和报告的质量,同时也有助于改进研究设计的方法学质量。本文的英文原文"Preferred reporring items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:the PRISMAstatement"发表于PLoS Med.2009;6(7):e1000097.doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097。该文中文版本由北京中医药大学循证医学中心李迅、曹卉娟翻译,刘建平审校(Tel:010-64286760;E-mail:jianpingl@hotmail.com)。中文译文的翻译出版由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目资助(No.200608504602)。
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 896
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Value judgments in the analysis and synthesis of evidence [J].
Strech, Daniel ;
Tilburt, Jon .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (06) :521-524
[2]  
Systematic reviews: when is an update an update?[J] . David Moher,Alexander Tsertsvadze.The Lancet . 2006 (9514)
[3]  
Compliance With Quorom And Quality Of Reporting Of Overlapping Meta-Analyses On The Role Of Acetylcysteine In The Prevention Of Contrast Associated Nephropathy: Case Study[J] . Giuseppe G. L. Biondi-Zoccai,Marzia Lotrionte,Antonio Abbate,Luca Testa,Enrico Remigi,Francesco Burzotta,Marco Valgimigli,Enrico Romagnoli,Filippo Crea,Pierfrancesco Agostoni.BMJ: British Medical Journal . 2006 (7535)
[4]  
Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making[J] . John Lavis,Huw Davies,Andy Oxman,Jean-Louis Denis,Karen Golden-Biddle,Ewan Ferlie.Journal of Health Services Research & Policy . 2005 (1_su)
[5]   Putting clinical trials into context [J].
Young, C ;
Horton, R .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9480) :107-108
[6]  
Assessment Of Methodological Quality Of Primary Studies By Systematic Reviews: Results Of The Metaquality Study Cross Sectional Study[J] . Lorenzo P. Moja,Elena Telaro,Roberto D’Amico,Ivan Moschetti,Laura Coe,Alessandro Liberati.BMJ: British Medical Journal . 2005 (7499)
[7]  
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data[J] . Craig J Whittington,Tim Kendall,Peter Fonagy,David Cottrell,Andrew Cotgrove,Ellen Boddington.The Lancet . 2004 (9418)
[8]  
Number Of Published Systematic Reviews And Global Burden Of Disease: Database Analysis[J] . George H. Swingler,Jimmy Volmink,John P. A. Ioannidis.BMJ: British Medical Journal . 2003 (7423)
[9]  
Systematic Reviews In Health Care: Systematic Reviews Of Evaluations Of Diagnostic And Screening Tests[J] . Jonathan J. Deeks.BMJ: British Medical Journal . 2001 (7305)
[10]   Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature [J].
Kelly, KD ;
Travers, A ;
Dorgan, M ;
Slater, L ;
Rowe, BH .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 38 (05) :518-526