Padua量表在中国大学生人群中的修订

被引:30
作者
钟杰 [1 ]
秦漠 [1 ]
蔡文菁 [1 ]
谭洁清 [1 ]
王雨吟 [1 ]
徐晓婧 [1 ]
张昕 [1 ]
刘军 [2 ]
机构
[1] 北京大学心理学系
[2] 北京安定医院
关键词
强迫症状; Padua量表; 信度; 因素分析;
D O I
10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2006.01.001
中图分类号
B844.2 [青少年心理学];
学科分类号
摘要
目的:本研究旨在将帕多瓦量表(PaduaInventory,PI)引进中国,考察PI在中国非临床样本中的因素结构,并检验PI的总分和各因素分的性别差异。方法:样本一为1300个大学生的数据(男680人,女542人,性别缺失78人,平均年龄19.6±2.2岁),样本二为30名大学生在初测4周后进行了重测。结果:探索性因素分析获得PI的4个因素:思维失控与怀疑感、受驱使与行为失控感、污染和检查。信度检验:PI总分的α系数为0.96,四个因素α系数分别为0.94,0.85,0.86,0.83,重测信度分别为0.77,0.87,0.85,0.84。女性被试在因素3的得分显著高于男性(P=.000);男性被试在因素4的得分显著高于女性(P=0.017)。结论:PI具备合格的信度,需进一步研究其效度。
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 4
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
The assessment of obsessionalityusing the Padua Inventory:its validity in a British non-clinical sample. Macdonald A,Silva P. Personality and Individual Differences . 1999
[2]  
The assessment of obsessive-compulsive phenomena:psychometric and normative dataon the Padua Inventory from an Australian non-clinicalstudent sample. Kyrios M,Bhar S,Wade D. Behaviour Research and Therapy . 1996
[3]  
Obsessions and compulsions:dimensional struc-ture,reliability,convergent and divergent validity of thePadua Inventory. Oppen P. Behaviour Research and Therapy . 1992
[4]  
Reliability and validity ofthe Padua Inventory in an Iranian population. Mohamman A,Firoozabbadi A. BehaviourResearch and Therapy . 2005
[5]  
Abnormal and normalcompulsions. Muris P,Merckelbach H,Clavan M. Behaviour Research and Therapy . 1997
[6]  
Obsessions and Compulsions:The Padua Invent-ory. Sanavio E. Behaviour Research and Therapy . 1988
[7]  
Cross-cultural research methods. Ember CR,Ember M. . 2001
[8]  
Obsessions and compulsions:psy-chometric properties of the Padua Inventory with an Ameri-can college population. Sternberger L,Burns G. Behaviour Research and Therapy . 1990
[9]  
Obsessionsand compulsions:normative data on the Padua Inventoryfrom an Italian non-clinical adolescent sample. Mancini F,Gragnani A,Orazi F,Pietrangeli MG. BehaviourResearch and Therapy . 1999
[10]  
Nonclinical populations in research on obsessivecompulsive disorder:A critical review. Gibbs NA. Clinical PsychologyReview . 1996