不同年龄冠心病患者经桡动脉介入治疗的安全性和有效性对比分析

被引:7
作者
刘圣文
乔树宾
徐波
秦学文
姚民
袁晋青
陈珏
刘海波
尤士杰
胡奉环
吴元
戴军
张沛
杨伟宪
窦克非
邱洪
高展
慕朝伟
马卫华
吴永健
李建军
杨跃进
陈纪林
高润霖
机构
[1] 中国医学科学院中国协和医科大学心血管病研究所阜外心血管病医院冠心病中心
关键词
冠状动脉疾病; 支架; 年龄; 不良心脏事件;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R686 [筋腱、韧带、滑囊疾病及损伤];
学科分类号
摘要
目的分析不同年龄组冠心病患者经桡动脉介入治疗(TRI)住院期间安全性和有效性及不良事件的预测因素。方法研究对象为我院2004年5月至2009年5月接受TRI的16 293例冠心病患者,分析不同年龄组,中青年(<65岁)、老年(65~79岁)、老老年(≥80岁)患者住院期间临床后果,多因素分析住院期间主要不良心脏事件(包括死亡、心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建)的影响因素。结果中青年、老年、老老年组造影成功率分别为97.5%,97.4%,98.1%(P>0.05),而操作并发症随年龄增加而增加(0.8%、1.2%、4.0%,P<0.01)。中青年、老年、老老年组之间住院期间主要不良心脏事件发生率(分别为1.3%,2.2%,7.5%,P<0.01)和病死率(0.1%、0.3%、2.9%,P<0.01)随年龄增加而增加,植入药物涂层支架比例逐渐下降(92.0%、89.6%、57.8%,P<0.01)。多因素分析表明住院期间主要不良心脏事件的独立预测因素[OR(95%可信区间)]为年龄≥80岁[6.26(3.33~11.74);P<0.01],既往心肌梗死[2.19(1.66~2.88);P<0.01]、左主干病变[2.02(1.04~3.91);P=0.04]、年龄65~79岁[1.83(1.37~2.43);P<0.01]、支架数[1.31(1.15~1.50);P<0.01]、支架总长度[1.01(1.00~1.02);P=0.03]、植入药物涂层支架[0.59(0.39~0.89);P=0.01]。结论中青年、老年患者经桡动脉介入治疗住院期间具有良好的临床疗效,而年龄≥80岁患者住院期间不良事件危险度明显增加。
引用
收藏
页码:2852 / 2855
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   A Randomized Comparison of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty [J].
Brueck, Martin ;
Bandorski, Dirk ;
Kramer, Wilfried ;
Wieczorek, Marcus ;
Hoeltgen, Reinhard ;
Tillmanns, Harald .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (11) :1047-1054
[2]  
Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials[J] . Sanjit S. Jolly,Shoaib Amlani,Martial Hamon,Salim Yusuf,Shamir R. Mehta.American Heart Journal . 2009 (1)
[3]   Outcome of Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stenting Used According to On- and Off-Label Criteria [J].
Carlsson, Jorg ;
James, Stefan K. ;
Lindback, Johan ;
Schersten, Fredrik ;
Nilsson, Tage ;
Stenestrand, Ulf ;
Lagerqvist, Bo .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (16) :1389-1398
[4]   Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Patients Above 75 Years of Age [J].
Achenbach, Stephan ;
Ropers, Dieter ;
Kallert, Lisa ;
Turan, Nesrin ;
Kraehner, Robert ;
Wolf, Tobias ;
Garlichs, Christoph ;
Flachskampf, Frank ;
Daniel, Werner G. ;
Ludwig, Josef .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2008, 72 (05) :629-635
[5]  
Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures[J] . Pierfrancesco Agostoni,Giuseppe G.L. Biondi-Zoccai,M.Luisa De Benedictis,Stefano Rigattieri,Marco Turri,Maurizio Anselmi,Corrado Vassanelli,Piero Zardini,Yves Louvard,Martial Hamon.Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 2004 (2)
[6]  
Unrestricted Utilization of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Compared With Conventional Bare Stent Implantation in the “Real World”: The R apamycin-E luting S tent E valuated A t R otterdam C ardiology H ospital (RESEARCH) Registry[J] . Pedro A. Lemos,Patrick W. Serruys,Ron T. van Domburg,Francesco Saia,Chourmouzios A. Arampatzis,Angela Hoye,Muzaffer Degertekin,Kengo Tanabe,Joost Daemen,Tommy K.K. Liu,Eugene McFadden,Georgios Sianos,Sjoerd H. Hofma,Pieter C. Smits,Willem J. van der Giessen,Pim J. de Fey
[7]   In-hospital outcomes of contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions in the very elderly [J].
Dynina, O ;
Vakili, BA ;
Slater, JN ;
Sherman, W ;
Ravi, KL ;
Green, SJ ;
Sanborn, TA ;
Brown, DL .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2003, 58 (03) :351-357
[8]  
Coronary Morphologic and Clinical Determinants of Procedural Outcome With Angioplasty for Multivessel Coronary Disease: Implications for Patient Selection[J] . Stephen G. Ellis,Michel G. Vandormael,Michael J. Cowley,Germano Disciascio,Ubeydullah Deligonul,Eric J. Topol,Thomas M. Bulle.Circulation . 1990 (4)
[9]  
Age-based differences of percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era. Floyd KC,Jayne JE,Kaplan AV, et al. Journal of Interventional Cardiology . 2006