直接前入路和后外侧入路全髋关节置换术早期功能康复的比较研究

被引:52
作者
赵海燕 [1 ]
夏亚一 [2 ]
康鹏德 [1 ]
聂涌 [1 ]
裴福兴 [1 ]
沈彬 [1 ]
杨静 [1 ]
周宗科 [1 ]
石小军 [1 ]
王浩洋 [1 ]
曾羿 [1 ]
刘欣 [1 ]
机构
[1] 成都, 四川大学华西医院骨科
[2] 兰州大学第二医院骨科
关键词
关节成形术, 置换, 髋; 康复; 步态;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R687.4 [关节手术];
学科分类号
100220 [骨科学];
摘要
目的探讨直接前入路(direct anterior approach, DAA)和后外侧入路(posterolateral approach, PLA)对全髋关节置换术组织损伤及早期功能康复的影响。方法回顾性分析2015年9月至2016年3月68例接受全髋关节置换术患者的资料, 男27例, 女41例。按手术入路分组:DAA组35例, 年龄(54.88±12.13)岁;PLA组33例, 年龄(53.18±14.72)岁。比较两组手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、肌酸激酶(Serum creatinekinase, CK)、C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein, CRP)、红细胞沉降率(erythrocyte sedimentation rate, ESR)、白介素-6(interleukin-6, IL-6)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale, VAS)、Harris髋关节功能评分、加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(The University of California at Los Angeles, UCLA)评分、术后住院时间、步态参数、影像学指标及并发症等。结果 DAA组手术切口长度较PLA组短[(11.23±0.97)cm与(15.16±1.12)cm]、手术时间较PLA组长[(73.77±9.20)min与(64.12±13.31)min]、术中出血量较PLA组大[(157.15±35.83)ml与(126.97±45.45)ml]、术后住院时间较PLA组短[(2.95±0.24)d与(3.35±0.51)d]。DAA组术后CK、CRP、ESR、IL-6值均低于PLA组。术后72 h内DAA组疼痛VAS评分低于PLA组, 两组差异有统计学意义。两组患者均随访6个月, 术后3个月时DAA组Harris髋关节功能评分、UCLA评分及步态参数均优于PLA组, 术后6个月两组差异无统计学意义。X线片上髋臼前倾角DAA组(16.4°±2.3°)较PLA组(20.4°±2.8°)小。DAA组1例术中出现股骨大转子尖部无移位骨折, PLA组无早期并发症发生。结论 DAA全髋关节置换术肌肉损伤小, 术后疼痛症状轻, 术后住院时间短, 早期髋臼假体稳定性更好, 更有利于早期髋关节功能康复, 但术中出血量大, 手术时间相对较长。
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Anterior muscle sparing approach for total hip arthroplasty [J].
Moskal, Joseph T. ;
Capps, Susan G. ;
Scanelli, John A. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 4 (01) :12-18
[2]
Posterolateral vs Direct Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty (POLADA Trial): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Differences in Serum Markers [J].
Rykov, Kyrill ;
Reininga, Inge H. F. ;
Sietsma, Maurits S. ;
Knobben, Bas A. S. ;
ten Have, Bas L. E. F. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (12) :3652-+
[3]
Comparison of Patient Function during the First Six Weeks after Direct Anterior or Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): A Randomized Study.[J].Christian P. Christensen;Cale A. Jacobs.The Journal of Arthroplasty.2015, 9S
[4]
Does Fluoroscopy With Anterior Hip Arthoplasty Decrease Acetabular Cup Variability Compared With a Nonguided Posterior Approach? [J].
Rathod, Parthiv A. ;
Bhalla, Sean ;
Deshmukh, Ajit J. ;
Rodriguez, Jose A. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (06) :1877-1885
[5]
Does the Direct Anterior Approach in THA Offer Faster Rehabilitation and Comparable Safety to the Posterior Approach? [J].
Rodriguez, Jose A. ;
Deshmukh, Ajit J. ;
Rathod, Parthiv A. ;
Greiz, Michelle L. ;
Deshmane, Prashant P. ;
Hepinstall, Matthew S. ;
Ranawat, Amar S. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (02) :455-463
[6]
Prospective Randomized Study of Direct Anterior vs Postero-Lateral Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Barrett, William P. ;
Turner, Shelly E. ;
Leopold, John P. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (09) :1634-1638
[7]
Soft-tissue changes in hip abductor muscles and tendons after total hip replacement COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIRECT ANTERIOR AND THE TRANSGLUTEAL APPROACHES [J].
Bremer, A. K. ;
Kalberer, F. ;
Pfirrmann, C. W. A. ;
Dora, C. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2011, 93B (07) :886-889
[8]
Total Hip Arthroplasty, state of the art for the 21st century [J].
Courpied, Jean-Pierre ;
Caton, Jacques Henri .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 35 (02) :149-150
[9]
Prospective Randomized Study of Two Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Restrepo, Camilo ;
Parvizi, Javad ;
Pour, Aidin Eslam ;
Hozack, William J. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2010, 25 (05) :671-679
[10]
Enhanced early outcomes with the anterior supine intermuscular approach in primary total hip arthroplasty..[J].Berend Keith R;Lombardi Adolph V;Seng Brian E;Adams Joanne B.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.2009,