发表性偏倚对系统评价的影响

被引:12
作者
董碧蓉
欧雪梅
赵伟业
机构
[1] 四川大学华西医院国际临床流行病学资源与培训中心
[2] 四川大学华西医院国际临床流行病学资源与培训中心 中国循证医学/Cochrane中心 成都
[3] 中国循证医学/Cochrane中心 成都
关键词
发表性偏倚; 系统评价;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-0 [一般理论];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
系统评价可以为临床实践提供可靠的证据。但在对文献进行系统评价的过程中,由于杂志编辑、作者、研究资金及研究结果等各方面的原因,使系统评价难免受到发表性偏倚的影响。在将系统评价结果应用于临床之前,必须应用漏斗图、分析法等方法对其进行评估,才能为患者做出最好的诊治决策。
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 173
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Publication bias:evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. Stern JM,Simes RJ. British Medical Journal . 1998
[2]  
Positive outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientifie meeting. Callaham ML,Wears RL,Weber EJ,et al. The Journal of The American Medical Association . 1998
[3]  
Publication bias and research on passive smoking:comparison of published and unpublished studies. Misakjian AL,Bero LA. The Journal of The American Medical Association . 1998
[4]  
Publication decisions and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance-or vice versa. Sterling TD. Journal of the American Statistical Association . 1959
[5]  
Publication bias:a problem in interpreting medical data. Begg C,Berlin J. J R Stat Soc . 1988
[6]  
Meta-analysis in the breech. Mann C. Science . 1990
[7]  
Bias in location and selection of studies. Egger M,Smith GD. British Medical Journal . 1998
[8]  
The NIH"E-biomed"proposal a potential threat to the evaluation and orderly dissemination of new clinical studies. Relman AS. The New England Journal of Medicine . 1999
[9]  
The"file drawer problem"and tolerance for null results. Rosenthal R. Psychological Bulletin . 1979
[10]  
Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis:a case study. Tramer MR,Reynolds DJ,Mooore RA,et al. British Medical Journal . 1997