急性心肌梗死患者初期支架植入和rt-PA静脉溶栓加补救支架植入对比研究

被引:8
作者
张大东
蔡煦
张瑞岩
张建盛
沈卫峰
机构
[1] 上海第二医科大学附属瑞金医院心脏科
[2] 上海第二医科大学附属瑞金医院心脏科 上海
[3] 上海
关键词
心肌梗死; 支架术; 溶栓疗法;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R542.22 [];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
目的 比较急性心肌梗死 (AMI)患者冠状动脉内初期支架植入和静脉rt PA溶栓加补救支架植入治疗的临床疗效。方法  98例首次AMI患者随机给以冠状动脉内初期支架植入 (初期支架组 :48例 )和静脉rt PA溶栓加补救支架植入 (溶栓加支架组 :5 0例 )。所有患者行急诊冠状动脉造影以TIMI血流分级法判断梗死相关冠状动脉 (IRA)开通情况。记录住院期心脏事件 ;出院前用二维超声心动图测定两组患者左心室舒张末期和收缩末期容量并推算左心室射血分数 (LVEF)。结果 急诊冠状动脉造影显示支架组 47例 (97 91% )溶栓加支架组 5 0例 (10 0 % )IRA血流TIMI 2 3级 ,但前者IRA前向血流TIMI 3级者明显增多 (分别为 93 8%和 6 0 0 % ,P =0 0 0 0 1)。两组患者住院期死亡率和心脏事件相似 ,但出院前超声心动图显示支架组LVEF(6 2 0 1%± 14 0 3% )高于溶栓加支架组(5 0 0 1%± 132 % ) ,P =0 0 0 0 1。结论 与静脉rt PA溶栓加补支架治疗相比 ,AMI初期支架植入可更好改善急性期心肌再灌注 ,并减少患者住院期心功能减退
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 17
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction. Garcia-Cantu E,Spaulding C,Corcos T,et al. The American Journal of Cardiology . 1996
[2]  
Coronary stenting in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty during acute myocardial infarction. Rodriguez AE,Fernandez M,Santaera O,et al. The American Journal of Cardiology . 1996
[3]  
One-week and six-month angiographic controls of stent implantation after occlusive and nonocclusive dissection during primary balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarion. Spaulding C,Cador R,Benhamda K,et al. The American Journal of Cardiology . 1997
[4]  
TIMI frame count.A quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Gibson CM,Cannon CP,Daley WL,et al. Circulation . 1996
[5]  
Prospecive muticenter study of the safety and feasibility of primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: in-hospital and 30-day results of the PAMI stent pilot trial. Stone GW,Brodie BR,Griffin JJ,et al. Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 1998
[6]  
Time to treament of acute myocardial infarction revisited. Cannon CP. Current Opinion in Cardiology . 1998
[7]  
Stents in acute myocardial infarction. Overlie PA. Current Opinion in Cardiology . 1998
[8]  
Rescue percutaneous translumminal coronary angioplasty. Flachskampf FA,Ellis SG. Current Opinion in Cardiology . 1998