亨廷顿的文武关系理论及其挑战者

被引:1
作者
杨英
机构
[1] 复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院
关键词
文武关系; 客观文人控制; 主观文人控制; 亨廷顿;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D08 [其他政治理论问题];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
民主政治中,文武关系悖论的解决需同时兼顾三大问题:使军队强大到足以保护国家安全;保证如此强大的军队不威胁国内政权;使强大但处于政治控制之下的军队符合民主政治的要求。亨廷顿提出了客观文人控制方案,以求同时解决这三大问题。其解决之道是通过军事专业主义最大化寻求各种理论正面之间的平衡。挑战这一方案的理论大致有三类:对军事专业主义的挑战、对文武分离的挑战、对制度路径的挑战。对此,本文分析认为,挑战理论无论在案例优势与案例经验传统的捕捉、对复杂文武关系悖论的解决,还是在理论所兼顾到的各种功能指标、理论的自稳性方面均未超越亨氏理论,挑战是失败的。
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 45
页数:11
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Civilian Monitoring of U.S. Military Operations in the Information Age[J] . Damon Coletta.Armed Forces & Society . 2006 (1)
[2]  
Democratic Civil-Military Relations in Bosnia and Herzegovina[J] . Graeme P. Herd.Armed Forces & Society . 2006 (4)
[3]  
Book Review: Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations[J] . James Burk.Armed Forces & Society . 2004 (3)
[4]  
The Second Generation Problematic: Rethinking Democracy and Civil-Military Relations[J] . Andrew Cottey.Armed Forces & Society . 2002 (1)
[5]  
Crafting Civilian Control in Emerging Democracies: Argentina and Venezuela[J] . Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affair . 2000 (3)
[6]   A unified theory of civil-military relations [J].
Bland, DL .
ARMED FORCES & SOCIETY, 1999, 26 (01) :7-+
[7]   Samuel Huntington and communist civil-military relations [J].
Herspring, DR .
ARMED FORCES & SOCIETY, 1999, 25 (04) :557-+
[8]  
Crisis as Shirking: An Agency Theory Explanation of the Souring of American Civil-Military Relations[J] . Peter D. Feaver.Armed Forces & Society . 1998 (3)
[9]  
Soldiers, States, and Structures: The End of the Cold War and Weakening U.S. Civilian Control[J] . Michael C. Desch.Armed Forces & Society . 1998 (3)
[10]   How democracies control the military [J].
Kohn, RH .
JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, 1997, 8 (04) :140-153