善治的三维定位

被引：12

作者：

吴畏

机构：

[1] 华中科技大学国家治理研究院

来源：

华中科技大学学报(社会科学版) | 2015年 / 29卷 / 02期

关键词：

善治; 治理; 善治指标; 治理指数;

D O I：

10.19648/j.cnki.jhustss1980.2015.02.001

中图分类号：

D035 [国家行政管理];

学科分类号：

1204 ; 120401 ;

摘要：

善治可以分别做出形式定义和实质定义。目前大多数文献涉及的主要是实质定义,而且这些实质定义往往表现为与具体语境、实践领域和理论视角等密切相关的工作定义。从哲学的立场上看,需要从本体论、方法论和实践论上引入三对范畴来分别对善治的不同定义进行澄清,即事实与价值、分析与综合、描述与规范。把握善治的基本规定要根据事实与价值这对范畴,而对善治的构成要素的说明需要分析与综合这对范畴,描述与规范这对范畴则是阐明善治的具体意义所不可或缺的。善治在三维定位中其概念本质得以彰显,基本逻辑结构得以揭示,同时形成共同的善治理念和建构统一的善治理论所面临的主要问题得以呈现。

引用

页码：1 / 9

页数：9

共 11 条

[1]

(De)politicizing good governance: the World Bank Institute, the OECD and the politics of governance indicators[J] . Tero Erkkil?,Ossi Piironen.Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research . 2014

[2]

Beyond the integrity paradox – towards ‘good enough’ governance?[J] . Mark Evans.Policy Studies . 2012 (1)

[3] Is the EU's Governance 'Good'? An assessment of EU governance in its partnership with ACP states [J].

Slocum-Bradley, Nikki ;

Bradley, Andrew .

THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2010, 31 (01) :31-49

[4]

The Good Governance Agenda: Beyond Indicators without Theory[J] . Matt Andrews.Oxford Development Studies . 2008 (4)

[5]

Impartiality as a Basic Norm for the Quality of Government: A Reply to Francisco Longo and Graham Wilson[J] . BOROTHSTEIN,JANTEORELL.Governance . 2008 (2)

[6]

The New Governance: Governing without Government[J] . R. A. W.Rhodes.Political Studies . 2006 (4)

[7]

Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges[J] . Thomas G Weiss.Third World Quarterly . 2000 (5)

[8]

Governance and modern welfare states[J] . Fran?ois‐Xavier Merrien.International Social Science Journal . 1998 (155)

[9]

The genesis of ‘governance’ and Enlightenment conceptions of the cosmopolitan world order[J] . Anthony Pagden.International Social Science Journal . 1998 (155)

[10]

The proper use of governance in international relations[J] . Marie‐Claude Smouts.International Social Science Journal . 1998 (155)

← 1 2 →