测量与解释民众的贪腐认知:台北市与高雄市的实证分析

被引：5

作者：

余致力

庄文忠

机构：

[1] 台湾世新大学行政管理学系

来源：

公共行政评论 | 2016年 / 9卷 / 03期

关键词：

贪腐认知; 贪腐容忍度; 廉政治理;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D262.6 [党的纪律检查工作];

学科分类号：

0308 ;

摘要：

过去数十年间,全球贪腐研究迅速成长,特别是有关廉政评价的实务调查,例如国际透明组织的清廉印象指数,及其所衍生的学术研究论文,对帮助吾人了解贪腐状况甚有贡献。然而,这些调查与研究所呈现的主观廉政评价,却有一些方法论上的问题,经常受到批评。其中最大的问题之一,便是未将贪腐容忍的概念纳入,其所展现的廉政评价数据,在信度与效度上常常受到质疑及挑战。为弥补过去学术研究对贪腐容忍概念的忽略,论文旨在研发贪腐容忍的测量工具,并以电话调查法搜集第一手资料,测量1 069位台北市民与1071位高雄市民的贪腐认知,并解释这些民众的贪腐容忍程度受到哪些因素的影响,以期对贪腐测量的学术基础问题,做出重要贡献。

引用

页码：21 / 41+185 +185-186

页数：23

共 13 条

[1] Can Corruption Be Measured? Comparing Global Versus Local Perceptions of Corruption in East and Southeast Asia [J].

Lin, Min-Wei ;

Yu, Chilik .

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS, 2014, 16 (02) :140-157

[2]

Indicators and Implications of Zero Tolerance of Corruption: The Case of Hong Kong[J] . Ting Gong,Shiru Wang.Social Indicators Research . 2013 (3)

[3]

Quality of Government: What You Get[J] . Annual Review of Political Science . 2009

[4]

Corruption: A Review[J] . Arvind K.Jain.Journal of Economic Surveys . 2008 (1)

[5]

The Third Phase in the Fight Against Corruption: Implementation and Comparative Administrative Ethics[J] . JeremyDavid Pope.Public Integrity . 2007 (1)

[6]

What Have We Learned About the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research?[J] . Daniel Treisman.Annual Review of Political Science . 2007

[7]

Causes of corruption: a survey of cross-country analyses and extended results[J] . Lorenzo Pellegrini,Reyer Gerlagh.Economics of Governance . 2008 (3)

[8]

All for All: Equality, Corruption, and Social Trust[J] . Bo Rothstein,Eric M. Uslaner.World Politics . 2005 (1)

[9]

Perceptions of Country Corruption: Antecedents and Outcomes[J] . James H. Davis,John A. Ruhe.Journal of Business Ethics . 2003 (4)

[10]

The causes of corruption: a cross-national study[J] . Daniel Treisman.Journal of Public Economics . 2000 (3)

← 1 2 →