论TRIPS协议中“三步检验法”存废之争和解决途径

被引:12
作者
张曼
机构
[1] 西北大学法学院
关键词
三步检验法; 《平衡解释“三步检验法”宣言》; 著作权法;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D923.41 [著作权法];
学科分类号
030105 ;
摘要
TRIPS协议第13条"三步检验法"作为著作权限制和例外制度的总指导,在具体司法实践中多采用严格解释,大大局限了限制制度和例外制度的适用。对此问题,国外学界对三步检验法存在的必要性进行了激烈讨论,存废之争不绝于耳。《平衡解释"三步检验法"宣言》的产生标志着三步检验法作为普适性标准迈入新阶段,具有十分重要的价值和意义。同时,这一变化对我国著作权法第三次修订也具有积极影响。
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 108
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
"Of Oceans,Islands,and Inland Water-How Much Room for Exceptions and Limitations Under the Three-Step Test?". Annette Kur. Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business . 2009
[2]  
The’’Three-Step Test’’in European Copyright Law-Problems and Solutions. Jonathan Griffiths. Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper . 2009
[3]  
Fixing the Three-step Test. Koelman. EuropeanIntellectual Property Review . 2006
[4]  
The International Three-Step Test:A ModelProvision for EC Fair Use Legislation. Martin Senftleben. Journal of Intellec-tual Property,Information,Technology and E-Commerce Law . 2010
[5]  
The Protection of Technological Measures vs. the Copyright Limitations. Kaniel j.koelman. ALAI congress adjuncts and alternatives for copyright . 2001
[6]  
From Berne to National Law, Vie the Directive: The Dangerous Mutations to Three-step Test. Christophe Geiger. European Intellectual Property Review . 2007
[7]  
Overcoming the Achilles Heel of Copyright Law. Haochen Sun. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property . 2007
[8]  
Declaration of A Balanced Interpretation of The"Three-Step Test"In Copyright Law". http://www.ip.mpg.de/en/research/researchnews/declaration-on-the-three-step-test-list-of-supporters.html . 2016
[9]  
United States-Section 110(5) of US Copyright Act. WT/DS160/R . 2000
[10]  
The Purpose of Copyright Law in Canada. Daniel J. Gervais. University of Ottawa Law and Technology Journal . 2005