选择实验方法研究进展

[1] Learning how to choose—effects of instructional choice sets in discrete choice experiments[J] . Jürgen Meyerhoff,Klaus Glenk.Resource and Energy Economics . 2015

[2] Evaluating mitigation and calibration techniques for hypothetical bias in choice experiments [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 57 (12) : 1831 - 1848

[3] Testing hypothetical bias with a real choice experiment using respondents' own money [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 41 (01) : 25 - 46

[4] 2013 WAEA Keynote Address: Strategies for Overcoming Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Surveys[J] . Loomis,John B.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics . 2014 (1)

[5] Stated and Inferred Attribute Attendance Models: A Comparison with Environmental Choice Experiments[J] . Marit E. Kragt.J Agric Econ . 2013 (3)

[6] Information Processing Pattern and Propensity to Buy: An Investigation of Online Point-of-Purchase Behavior[J] . Ofer Mintz,Imran S. Currim,Ivan Jeliazkov.Marketing Science . 2013 (5)

[7] Willingness to pay for environmental attributes of non-food agricultural products: a real choice experiment[J] . Celine Michaud,Daniel Llerena,Iragael Joly.European Review of Agricultural Economics . 2013 (2)

[8] ON THE USE OF HONESTY PRIMING TASKS TO MITIGATE HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN CHOICE EXPERIMENTS [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 95 (05) : 1136 - 1154

[9] Attending to the Reasons for Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments[J] . Mohammed Hussen Alemu,Morten Raun M?rkbak,S?ren B?ye Olsen,Carsten Lynge Jensen.Environmental and Resource Economics . 2013 (3)

[10] Making use of respondent reported processing information to understand attribute importance: a latent variable scaling approach[J] . Stephane Hess,David A. Hensher.Transportation . 2013 (2)

[1] Learning how to choose—effects of instructional choice sets in discrete choice experiments[J] . Jürgen Meyerhoff,Klaus Glenk.Resource and Energy Economics . 2015

[2] Evaluating mitigation and calibration techniques for hypothetical bias in choice experiments [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 57 (12) : 1831 - 1848

[3] Testing hypothetical bias with a real choice experiment using respondents' own money [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 41 (01) : 25 - 46

[4] 2013 WAEA Keynote Address: Strategies for Overcoming Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Surveys[J] . Loomis,John B.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics . 2014 (1)

[5] Stated and Inferred Attribute Attendance Models: A Comparison with Environmental Choice Experiments[J] . Marit E. Kragt.J Agric Econ . 2013 (3)

[6] Information Processing Pattern and Propensity to Buy: An Investigation of Online Point-of-Purchase Behavior[J] . Ofer Mintz,Imran S. Currim,Ivan Jeliazkov.Marketing Science . 2013 (5)

[7] Willingness to pay for environmental attributes of non-food agricultural products: a real choice experiment[J] . Celine Michaud,Daniel Llerena,Iragael Joly.European Review of Agricultural Economics . 2013 (2)

[8] ON THE USE OF HONESTY PRIMING TASKS TO MITIGATE HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN CHOICE EXPERIMENTS [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 95 (05) : 1136 - 1154

[9] Attending to the Reasons for Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments[J] . Mohammed Hussen Alemu,Morten Raun M?rkbak,S?ren B?ye Olsen,Carsten Lynge Jensen.Environmental and Resource Economics . 2013 (3)

[10] Making use of respondent reported processing information to understand attribute importance: a latent variable scaling approach[J] . Stephane Hess,David A. Hensher.Transportation . 2013 (2)