骨质疏松骨折后再骨折的临床风险因素

被引:54
作者
阮文东 [1 ]
王沛 [1 ]
雪原 [1 ]
马信龙 [2 ]
周先虎 [1 ]
机构
[1] 天津医科大学总医院骨科
[2] 天津医院骨科
关键词
骨质疏松; 骨折; 危险性评估;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R687.3 [骨骼手术];
学科分类号
100220 [骨科学];
摘要
目的探讨骨质疏松患者初次骨折后发生再骨折的风险及其临床特点。方法收集2006年1月至2008年1月门诊及住院的年龄50岁以上、临床可确诊的骨质疏松骨折患者273例,根据是否有骨质疏松骨折病史分为再骨折组48例和骨折组225例。分析患者一般资料、骨折类型、股骨颈DXA骨密度测定T值、Charlson合并症指数、骨折时间等临床特征,并行运动协调技能评价。结果骨折组年龄(67.7±8.5)岁,再骨折组(72.7±9.5)岁;再骨折组女性占77.1%,高于骨折组女性构成比70.2%;再骨折类型以椎体骨折后再次发生股骨颈骨折最多见,其次为股骨颈骨折后再次发生股骨颈骨折。再骨折发生的风险因素包括高龄(>75岁,HR=1.23;>85岁,HR=1.68)、女性(HR=1.36)、曾发生椎体骨折(HR=1.62)、曾发生髋部骨折(HR=1.27),骨密度-T值<-3.5(HR=1.38)及运动协调技能减退(HR=1.27)。再骨折平均发生于初次骨折后(3.7±2.5)年。骨折组随访2年内再骨折发生率4.9%(11/225)。结论有初次骨质疏松骨折病史的患者发生再骨折的风险仍然很明显,两次骨折之间有足够的间隔采取措施降低再骨折的风险。特别是对发生椎体、髋部骨折的老年女性应进行干预,进行运动协调技能的康复训练和防跌倒练习。
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]
西安市中老年居民运动机能综合评价标准的应用研究 [J].
张欢 ;
张帆 ;
吴林珍 ;
崔文慧 .
西安体育学院学报, 2006, (05) :82-86+105
[2]
骨质疏松骨折诊疗指南.[J]..中华骨科杂志.2008, 10
[3]
Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study [J].
Ioannidis, George ;
Papaioannou, Alexandra ;
Hopman, Wilma M. ;
Akhtar-Danesh, Noori ;
Anastassiades, Tassos ;
Pickard, Laura ;
Kennedy, Courtney C. ;
Prior, Jerilynn C. ;
Olszynski, Wojciech P. ;
Davison, Kenneth S. ;
Goltzman, David ;
Thabane, Lehana ;
Gafni, Amiran ;
Papadimitropoulos, Emmanuel A. ;
Brown, Jacques P. ;
Josse, Robert G. ;
Hanley, David A. ;
Adachi, Jonathan D. .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2009, 181 (05) :265-271
[4]
Secular trends in hip fracture incidence and recurrence [J].
Melton, L. J., III ;
Kearns, A. E. ;
Atkinson, E. J. ;
Bolander, M. E. ;
Achenbach, S. J. ;
Huddleston, J. M. ;
Therneau, T. M. ;
Leibson, C. L. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 20 (05) :687-694
[5]
Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX ? —assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK.[J].J. A. Kanis;E. V. McCloskey;H. Johansson;O. Strom;F. Borgstrom;A. Oden.Osteoporosis International.2008, 10
[6]
National Osteoporosis Foundation 2008 Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis and the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX): What They Mean to the Bone Densitometrist and Bone Technologist [J].
Watts, Nelson B. ;
Lewiecki, E. Michael ;
Miller, Paul D. ;
Baim, Sanford .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2008, 11 (04) :473-477
[7]
Short time-frame from first to second hip fracture in the Funen County Hip Fracture Study [J].
Nymark, T. ;
Lauritsen, J. M. ;
Ovesen, O. ;
Rock, N. D. ;
Jeune, B. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 17 (09) :1353-1357
[8]
Assessment of risk factors for second hip fractures in Japanese elderly [J].
Yamanashi, A ;
Yamazaki, K ;
Kanamori, M ;
Mochizuki, K ;
Okamoto, S ;
Koide, Y ;
Kin, K ;
Nagano, A .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 16 (10) :1239-1246
[9]
Prediction of fracture from low bone mineral density measurements overestimates risk [J].
Kanis, JA ;
Johnell, O ;
Oden, A ;
Jonsson, B ;
De Laet, C ;
Dawson, A .
BONE, 2000, 26 (04) :387-391
[10]
ASSESSMENT OF FRACTURE RISK AND ITS APPLICATION TO SCREENING FOR POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS - SYNOPSIS OF A WHO REPORT [J].
KANIS, JA ;
ALEXEEVA, L ;
BONJOUR, JP ;
BURKHARDT, P ;
CHRISTIANSEN, C ;
COOPER, C ;
DELMAS, P ;
JOHNELL, O ;
JOHNSTON, C ;
KANIS, JA ;
KHALTAEV, N ;
LIPS, P ;
MAZZUOLI, G ;
MELTON, LJ ;
MEUNIER, P ;
SEEMAN, E ;
STEPAN, J ;
TOSTESON, A .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 4 (06) :368-381