A study on the design of a hybrid policy for carbon abatement

被引:1
作者
Bo Zhang [1 ]
Mingyang He [1 ]
Haoran Pan [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Economics, Peking University
[2] School of Economics and Resource Management, Beijing Normal University
关键词
Carbon tax; carbon trading; hybrid policy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F812.42 [税收]; F832.5 [金融市场]; X196 [环境经济学];
学科分类号
020203 ; 1201 ; 020204 ; 02 ; 0201 ; 020106 ;
摘要
A necessary way to mitigate global warming is carbon reduction, which the international community is now actively promoting. China has committed a target goal for carbon reduction to the international society, and has devoted a great effort toward researching the impact of related policies. Carbon taxation and carbon trading are the two main mechanisms to advocate carbon abatement, which many countries have been using. Each of these two mechanisms possesses advantages and disadvantages, and an appropriate combination of them can make best use of their advantages while bypassing their disadvantages, creating a superior mechanism. In our opinion, the main differences between these two mechanisms are that carbon taxation has a lower institution cost(consisting of the related infrastructural investment and the regulation cost,etc), and is easier to operate, but lacks the flexibility in response to variations of market conditions. However, this flexibility is just the origin of risk, which increases the difficulty for firms in their decision of carbon abatement and is an indirect way to incentivize carbon abatement, compared to carbon trading, which has a more direct effect in carbon reduction. Based on the above observation, we present a hybrid mechanism of carbon abatement, which is an organized combination of carbon taxation and carbon trading. It consists of two parts: first, the carbon taxation, which has a progressive tax rate, second, the carbon trading. Small firms will only pay the carbon tax, while large firms, will first need to get the initial carbon emission quotas by some way, and then trade it in the carbon market if necessary. For firms with extra emissions,they will receive a punishment according to a high carbon tax rate. This hybrid policy considers the equity between different firms in carbon emission rights as well as the efficiency of the mechanism while decreasing the risk level for firms in the carbon emission decision, making it superior to the two previous policies. We also analyze the feasibility of this hybrid policy in China,address some important issues in the implementation of this hybrid policy in China and present the relevant suggestions. The discussion in this paper can serve as a reference to the government in the decision of carbon policies.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 57
页数:8
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   CGE model-based analysis of the neutralized hybrid carbon policy and its decomposed effects on economic growth,carbon reduction,and energy utilization costs [J].
Rui Sun ;
Dan Kuang .
ChineseJournalofPopulation,ResourcesandEnvironment, 2015, (01) :43-54
[2]   基于动态边际减排成本模拟的碳排放权交易与碳税选择机制 [J].
吴力波 ;
钱浩祺 ;
汤维祺 .
经济研究, 2014, 49 (09) :48-61+148
[3]   碳减排政策:碳税、碳交易还是两者兼之? [J].
石敏俊 ;
袁永娜 ;
周晟吕 ;
李娜 .
管理科学学报 , 2013, (09) :9-19
[4]   开征碳税的条件及碳税的动态调整 [J].
张博 ;
徐承红 .
中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23 (06) :16-20
[5]  
Tax and trade: a hybrid climate policy instrument to control carbon prices and emissions[J] . Brian F. Snyder.Climate Policy . 2015 (6)
[6]   Optimal mix of emissions taxes and cap-and-trade [J].
Mandell, Svante .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 56 (02) :131-140
[7]   Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate change [J].
Pizer, WA .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2002, 85 (03) :409-434
[8]  
Hybrid Carbon Incentive Mechanisms and Political Acceptability[J] . Herman R.J. Vollebergh,Jan L. De Vries,Paul R. Koutstaal.Environmental and Resource Economics . 1997 (1)
[9]  
Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader's guide[J] . Lawrence H. Goulder.International Tax and Public Finance . 1995 (2)