基因污染的现行侵权法规范之因应政策——以损害救济为中心的初步分析

被引:7
作者
王康
机构
[1] 上海政法学院法律学院
关键词
转基因技术; 基因污染; 损害赔偿; 危险责任; 损害救济;
D O I
10.19525/j.issn1008-407x.2012.04.024
中图分类号
D923 [民法];
学科分类号
030105 ;
摘要
基因污染在损害形态上属于生态损害与传统损害的典型复合,但就我国现行法律规范而言,只能就传统损害提供救济。基因污染在行为类型上可以归于环境侵权,将其定位于危险责任是基本的侵权法政策。污染者作为加害人应对受害人承担无过错的连带责任。在加害人内部,除非转基因作物实际种植者故意或者有重大过失,基因公司应承担基因污染损害的最终责任。此外,还要建立一个个体、社会、国家责任互动的综合性损害救济体系。
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 125
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
What liability of growing genetically engi-neered crops. JONES A W. Drake Journal of Agricultural Law . 2002
[2]  
Percy Schmeiser vs Monsanto:The Storyof a Canadian Farmer’’s Fight to Defend the Rights ofFarmers and the Future of Seeds. Democracy Now. http://www.democracynow.org/2010/9/17/percy_schmeiser_vs_mon-santo_the_story . 2011
[3]  
Monsanto Canada Inc.v.Schmeiser. 1S.C.R.902,2004SCC34,239D.L.R.(4th)271,31C.P.R.(4th)161 . 2004
[4]  
Blown Profits:Genetic Drift Affects Morethan Biology-US Farmers Stand to Lose Millions. SHADID A. Bos-ton Globe . 2001
[5]  
Farmers fight to save organic crops:genet-ic contamination of organic crops by genetically-modifiedPlants. LILLISTON B. The Progressive . 2001
[6]  
Recommendation of the council on guiding princi-ples concerning international economic aspects of environ-mental policies. OECD. http://acts.oecd.org/Instru-ments/ShowInstrum.ent View.aspx?InstrumentID=4&Lang=en&Book=False . 2011
[7]  
Liability for the release of GMOs intothe environment:exploring the boundaries of nuisance. RODGERS C P. Cambridge Law Journal . 2003
[8]  
USDA Concludes Engineered CreepingBentgrass Investigation. USDA News Release . 2011
[9]  
Biotech pollution:assessing liability forgenetically modified crop Production and genetic drift. RICHARD A R. Idaho L.Rev . 2000
[10]  
Hoffman v.Monsanto Canada Inc. 2007SKCA 47(Can-LII) . 2011