中国和印度不平衡发展的比较研究

被引：20

作者：

Shubham Chaudhuri

Martin Ravallion

机构：

[1] 世界银行发展研究局

来源：

经济研究 | 2008年 / 01期

关键词：

增长; 发展; 不平衡; 贫困减少;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

F124 [经济建设和发展]; F135.1 [];

学科分类号：

0201 ; 020105 ;

摘要：

本文考察了中国和印度近年来经济增长不平衡的情况,并分析了不平衡增长对不均等和贫困的影响。通过对家庭调查数据和官方加总数据的分析,本文发现增长存在不平衡——区域间、产业间和家庭层面上,这表明减贫工作进展不平衡,若增长更平衡,减贫效果可能更好;另外,收入不均等程度也在提高。本文探讨了增长不平衡及其应引起重视的原因。具体讨论围绕"有利的"和"不利的"不均等两个概念展开——不均等与不平衡增长对公平性以及长期增长与发展的有利或不利影响。我们认为,需要制定相关政策,保持有利的不均等——继续鼓励创新和投资,同时降低不利的不均等的程度,尤其是通过人力资本和农村基础设施投资,帮助贫困人口参与市场。

引用

页码：4 / 20

页数：17

共 20 条

[1]

Does rising landlessness signal success or failure for Vietnam's agrarian transition?[J] . Martin Ravallion,Dominique van de Walle.Journal of Development Economics . 2007 (2)

[2]

Nature of Opposition to Economic Reforms in India[J] . Pranab Bardhan.Economic and Political Weekly . 2005 (48)

[3] Spatial inequality in education and health care in China [J].

Zhang, XB ;

Kanbur, R .

CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 16 (02) :189-204

[4]

Hidden impact? Household saving in response to a poor-area development project[J] . Martin Ravallion,Shaohua Chen.Journal of Public Economics . 2005 (11)

[5] Survey nonresponse and the distribution of income [J].

Korinek A. ;

Mistiaen J.A. ;

Ravallion M. .

The Journal of Economic Inequality, 2006, 4 (1) :33-55

[6]

Half a World: Regional Inequality in Five Great Federations[J] . Branko Milanovic.Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy . 2005 (4)

[7]

Democracy, Economic Reforms and Election Results in India[J] . K. C. Suri.Economic and Political Weekly . 2004 (51)

[8]

Poverty in India in the 1990s: Revised Results for All-India and 15 Major States for 1993-94[J] . K. Sundaram,Suresh D. Tendulkar.Economic and Political Weekly . 2003 (46)

[9]

Measuring Aggregate Welfare in Developing Countries: How Well Do National Accounts and Surveys Agree?[J] . Martin Ravallion.Review of Economics and Statistics . 2003 (3)

[10] Why has economic growth been more pro-poor in some states of India than others? [J].

Ravallion, M ;

Datt, G .

JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2002, 68 (02) :381-400

← 1 2 →