GRADE:从证据到推荐

被引:19
作者
Gordon H Guyatt
Andrew D Oxman
Regina Kunz
Yngve Falck-Ytter
Gunn E Vist
Alessandro Liberati
Holger J Schünemann
谭培勇
陈耀龙
李幼平
机构
[1] 代表GRADE工作组
关键词
临床医生; 利大于弊; 工作组; 中风; 患者; 大厥; 风证; 干预措施; 出血风险; GRADE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R195 [卫生调查与统计];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
<正>GRADE系统将指南中的推荐分为强弱两级。本文旨在探索这种分级的含义及对患者、临床医生、政策制定者各自的意义。作为主要介绍为患者管理、制定和阐述推荐分级的GRADE方法的5篇系列文章中的第3篇,我们将讨论GRADE系统建议临床医生应该如何去诠释推荐强度的话题。
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 259
页数:3
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]  
Differences between perspectives of physicians and patients on anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: observational study. Devereaux PJ,Anderson DR,Gardner MJ,et al. British Medical Journal . 2001
[2]  
Decision aids for people facing health treatment of screening decisions. O’Connor,AM,Stacey,D,Entwistle,V. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews . 2003
[3]  
American College of ChestPhysicians Guidelines for the Prevention and Manage-ment of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery. Chest . 2005
[4]  
Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Clagett,GP,Jr,Anderson,FA,Levine,MN,Salzman,E,Wheeler,HB. Chest . 1992
[5]  
Letters,numbers,symbols and words:how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations. Schünemann HJ,Best D,Vist G,et al. Canadian Medical Association Journal . 2003