三版国际脓毒症诊断标准诊断效能分析

被引:37
作者
唐昊
刘冬
张画羽
李阳
常明涛
张岫竹
蒋东坡
张连阳
机构
[1] 第三军医大学大坪医院野战外科研究所全军战创伤中心,创伤、烧伤与复合伤国家重点实验室
关键词
创伤和损伤; 脓毒症; 患病率; 诊断;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R459.7 [急症、急救处理];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学];
摘要
目的探讨中国单个创伤重症医学科(ICU)中创伤后脓毒症患病率和相关危险因素,并评估1992、2001和2012国际脓毒症定义诊断创伤后脓毒症的效力。方法对大坪医院创伤ICU中符合入选标准的所有患者进行为期1d的横断面调查。调查数据包括人口学资料,临床特征,相关评分(APACHEⅡ、SOFA、GCS、ISS)和致伤机制。按照1992、2001和2012国际脓毒症指南脓毒症诊断标准中所有指标诊断脓毒症,分为A组、B组和C组,同时记录感染部位,感染病原菌,关键医学处置措施,明确感染证据,并追踪28d死亡发生率。选择痰、血液、伤口引流液(腹部、头颅和四肢)病原菌培养阳性作为诊断感染的确定性指标,计算3个版本的诊断灵敏度和特异度,并评估其诊断效能。结果共入选30例创伤患者,符合脓毒症诊断的A组23例,B组22例,C组20例,患病率分别为76.7%、73.3%、66.7%,3个诊断标准之间差异无统计学意义。28d死亡4例,均符合3个版本诊断标准,各组28d死亡发生率分别为17.4%、18.2%、25.0%,差异无统计学意义。A组诊断灵敏度为77.8%,特异度为25.0%;B组诊断灵敏度为82.2%,特异度为41.7%;C组诊断灵敏度为72.2%,特异度为41.7%。3个版本诊断效能之间差异无统计学意义。结论 3个版本的诊断标准对于创伤后脓毒症的诊断效能没有差异,1992年标准相对简单,可能更有利于创伤后脓毒症的诊断。
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 300
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
脓毒症:新兴生物学分子标志物初探(英文) [J].
解立新 .
解放军医学杂志, 2013, (01) :6-9
[2]
Comparative effectiveness of physician diagnosis and guideline definitions in identifying sepsis patients in the emergency department [J].
Brown, Tyler ;
Ghelani-Allen, Azmina ;
Yeung, Denise ;
Nguyen, H. Bryant .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2015, 30 (01) :71-77
[3]
Severe sepsis and septic shock.[J].Christa A Schorr;Sergio Zanotti;R Phillip Dellinger.Virulence.2014, 1
[4]
Timing and causes of death after injuries.[J].Justin Sobrino;Shahid Shafi.Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings.2013, 2
[5]
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, 2012 [J].
Dellinger, R. P. ;
Levy, Mitchell M. ;
Rhodes, Andrew ;
Annane, Djillali ;
Gerlach, Herwig ;
Opal, Steven M. ;
Sevransky, Jonathan E. ;
Sprung, Charles L. ;
Douglas, Ivor S. ;
Jaeschke, Roman ;
Osborn, Tiffany M. ;
Nunnally, Mark E. ;
Townsend, Sean R. ;
Reinhart, Konrad ;
Kleinpell, Ruth M. ;
Angus, Derek C. ;
Deutschman, Clifford S. ;
Machado, Flavia R. ;
Rubenfeld, Gordon D. ;
Webb, Steven ;
Beale, Richard J. ;
Vincent, Jean-Louis ;
Moreno, Rui .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 39 (02) :165-228
[6]
Epidemiology of Sepsis in Surgical Patients [J].
Moore, Laura J. ;
Moore, Frederick A. .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 92 (06) :1425-+
[7]
Incidence and risk factors for sepsis in surgical patients: A cohort study [J].
Galbiati Parminondi Elias, Adriana Cristina ;
Matsuo, Tiemi ;
Carvalho Grion, Cintia Magalhaes ;
Queiroz Cardoso, Lucienne Tibery ;
Verri, Paulo Henrique .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 27 (02) :159-166
[8]
Epidemiology and risk factors of sepsis after multiple trauma: An analysis of 29,829 patients from the Trauma Registry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery [J].
Wafaisade, Arasch ;
Lefering, Rolf ;
Bouillon, Bertil ;
Sakka, Samir G. ;
Thamm, Oliver C. ;
Paffrath, Thomas ;
Neugebauer, Edmund ;
Maegele, Marc .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (04) :621-628
[9]
An international survey: Public awareness and perception of sepsis [J].
Rubulotta, Francesca M. ;
Ramsay, Graham ;
Parker, Margaret M. ;
Dellinger, R. Phillip ;
Levy, Mitchell M. ;
Poeze, Martijn .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (01) :167-170
[10]
Managing severe sepsis: A national survey of current practices [J].
Durthaler, Jeffrey M. y ;
Ernst, Frank R. ;
Johnston, Joseph A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2009, 66 (01) :45-53