Family control,institutional environment and cash dividend policy:Evidence from China

被引:15
作者
Zhihua Wei [1 ]
Shinong Wu [2 ]
Changqing Li [2 ]
Wei Chen [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Economics,Xiamen University
[2] School of Management,Xiamen University
关键词
Family control; Institutional environment; Cash dividend; Corporate governance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F832.51 []; F276.6 [公司];
学科分类号
020204 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Using a sample of 1486 Chinese A-share listed companies for the period 2004-2008,this study empirically tests the impact of family control,institutional environment and their interaction on the cash dividend policy of listed companies.Our results indicate that(1)family firms have a lower cash dividend payout ratio and propensity to pay dividends than non-family firms;(2) a favorable regional institutional environment has a significant positive impact on the cash dividend payout ratio and propensity to pay dividends of listed companies;and(3) the impact of the regional institutional environment on cash dividends is stronger in family firms than in non-family firms.Somewhat surprisingly,we find that controlling family shareholders in China may intensify Agency Problem Ⅰ(the owner-manager conflict) rather than Agency Problem Ⅱ(the controlling shareholder-minority shareholder conflict),and thus have a significant negative impact on cash dividend policy.In contrast,a favorable regional institutional environment plays a positive corporate governance role in mitigating Agency Problem 1 and encouraging family firms to pay cash dividends.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 46
页数:18
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   公司信息透明度与大股东资金占用研究 [J].
王克敏 ;
姬美光 ;
李薇 .
南开管理评论, 2009, 12 (04) :83-91
[2]   资本结构与代理成本——来自中国国有控股上市公司和民营上市公司的经验证据 [J].
张兆国 ;
何威风 ;
闫炳乾 .
南开管理评论, 2008, (01) :39-47
[3]   隧道行为与盈余管理——基于我国家族上市公司的实证研究 [J].
刘伟 ;
刘星 .
南方经济, 2007, (11) :53-62
[4]   上市公司的股利政策究竟迎合了谁的需要——来自中国上市公司的经验数据 [J].
黄娟娟 ;
沈艺峰 .
会计研究, 2007, (08) :36-43+95
[5]   股利政策代理理论的实证检验 [J].
廖理 ;
方芳 .
南开管理评论, 2005, (05) :57-64
[6]   政府控制、治理环境与公司价值——来自中国证券市场的经验证据 [J].
夏立军 ;
方轶强 .
经济研究, 2005, (05) :40-51
[7]   大股东持股比例对代理成本影响的实证分析 [J].
宋力 ;
韩亮亮 .
南开管理评论, 2005, (01) :30-34
[8]  
现金股利:传递盈利信号还是起监督治理作用[J]. 杨熠,沈艺峰.中国会计评论. 2004(01)
[9]   政策性负担、道德风险与预算软约束 [J].
林毅夫 ;
李志赟 .
经济研究, 2004, (02) :17-27
[10]   金融压抑下的法治、金融发展和经济增长 [J].
卢峰 ;
姚洋 .
中国社会科学, 2004, (01) :42-55+206