近十年国外科技治理研究述评

被引：11

作者：

陈喜乐

朱本用

机构：

[1] 厦门大学哲学系

来源：

科技进步与对策 | 2016年 / 33卷 / 10期

关键词：

科技治理; 治理模式; 治理对策; 科技政策;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

F204 [科学技术管理];

学科分类号：

摘要：

随着跨地区及国际间科技问题的逐渐增多,加之与民生相关的科学技术迅速发展,科技发展呈现出复杂化、民生化与多主体参与等特点,从治理视角解读科技管理已成为西方学界的热门话题,尤其在能源、转基因、纳米技术等领域。但我国学者对科技治理的研究,无论是理论体系构建,还是科技治理参与主体、组织机制及国际性治理等均刚刚起步。因此,厘清近10年国外科技治理领域关注的热点问题,探索国外学者在科技治理模式构建、机制建设、政策工具应用和政策学习等方面取得的经验和教训,能为我国科技治理工作提供参考,并为深化科技体制改革提供借鉴。

引用

页码：148 / 153

页数：6

共 13 条

[1] Framing public engagement: A critical discourse analysis of GM Nation?[J] . Arif Attar,Audley Genus.Technological Forecasting & Social Change . 2014
[2] Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: A literature review[J] . Pita Spruijt,Anne B. Knol,Eleftheria Vasileiadou,Jeroen Devilee,Erik Lebret,Arthur C. Petersen.Environmental Science and Policy . 2014
[3] Policy learning to internationalize European science: possibilities and limitations of open coordination[J] . Merli Tamtik,Creso M. Sá.Higher Education . 2014 (3)
[4] Governance, Science Policy and Regions: An Introduction[J] . Beth Perry,Tim May.Regional Studies . 2007 (8)
[5] Multi-level Governance, Regions and Science in France: Between Competition and Equality[J] . Cecile Crespy,Jean-Alain Heraud,Beth Perry.Regional Studies . 2007 (8)
[6] Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: Risk communication or 'upstream engagement'?[J] . Nick Pidgeon,Tee Rogers-Hayden.Health, Risk & Society . 2007 (2)
[7] Multi-criteria decision analysis and environmental risk assessment for nanomaterials
Linkov, Igor
Satterstrom, F. Kyle
Steevens, Jeffery
Ferguson, Elizabeth
Pleus, Richard C.
[J]. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (04) : 543 - 554
[8] Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance[J] . ArchonFung.Public Administration Review . 2006
[9] Environmental Governance in the Information Age: The Emergence of Informational Governance[J] . Arthur P J Mol.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy . 2006 (4)
[10] Democratic Governance: Systems and Radical Perspectives[J] . MarkBevir.Public Administration Review . 2006 (3)

← 1 2 →