脑卒中后肢体运动功能障碍的生物学评估指标分析

被引:38
作者
杨雅馨
李颖
袁海峰
傅静
李文娟
张慧
马奔
张巧俊
机构
[1] 西安交通大学第二附属医院康复医学科,西安
关键词
脑卒中; 运动功能障碍; 弥散张量成像; 运动诱发电位;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R743.3 [急性脑血管疾病(中风)];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
目的探讨弥散张量成像(DTI)及运动诱发电位(MEP)能否作为评估脑卒中后肢体运动能障碍程度的生物学指标。方法选取60例脑卒中偏瘫患者并给予简式Fugl-Meyer运动功能(FMA)评定, 同时进行DTI及MEP检查, 分析DTI、MEP参数与肢体FMA评分间的相关性, 并利用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)明确其在评定重度运动功能障碍时的检验效能。结果①DTI参数大脑脚部分各向异性不对称系数(aFA)与患侧上、下肢FMA评分均具有负相关性(P<0.05);内囊后肢aFA值与患侧上肢FMA评分具有负相关性(P<0.05), 与患侧下肢FMA评分无明显相关性(P>0.05);MEP参数中枢运动传导时间(CMCT)、运动阈值(MT)异常程度均与该侧肢体FMA评分具有负相关性(P<0.05);②ROC曲线显示内囊后肢aFA值为评定上肢重度运动功能障碍的最佳指标, 分界值为0.167, 具有较好的检验效能;MEP波形缺失作为重度运动功能障碍的评定标准, 其灵敏度较高, 但特异度较低;③联合DTI及MEP进行系列检查, 可提高识别上肢重度运动功能障碍的特异度。结论 DTI及MEP相关参数可作为评估脑卒中后肢体运动功能障碍的生物学指标, 且对评定上肢重度运动功能障碍具有较好效能。
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
脑梗死患者经颅磁刺激运动诱发电位的特点及临床意义 [J].
陈纯 ;
王淳 ;
张标 ;
廖断修 ;
刘平 ;
付秀全 .
中国脑血管病杂志, 2005, (06) :260-262
[2]
Clinimetric properties of the Fugl-Meyer assessment with adapted guidelines for the assessment of arm function in hemiparetic patients after stroke [J].
Amano, Satoru ;
Umeji, Atsushi ;
Uchita, Akira ;
Hashimoto, Yukihisa ;
Takebayashi, Takashi ;
Takahashi, Kayoko ;
Uchiyama, Yuki ;
Domen, Kazuhisa .
TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2018, 25 (07) :500-508
[3]
Are we armed with the right data? Pooled individual data review of biomarkers in people with severe upper limb impairment after stroke.[J].Kathryn S Hayward;Julia Schmidt;Keith R Lohse;Sue Peters;Julie Bernhardt;Natasha A Lannin;Lara A Boyd.NeuroImage: Clinical.2017,
[4]
Return to Work 2–5 Years After Stroke: A Cross Sectional Study in a Hospital-Based Population.[J].H. J. Arwert;M. Schults;J. J. L. Meesters;R. Wolterbeek;J. Boiten;T. Vliet Vlieland.Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.2017, 2
[5]
Detection and Predictive Value of Fractional Anisotropy Changes of the Corticospinal Tract in the Acute Phase of a Stroke [J].
Doughty, Christopher ;
Wang, Jasmine ;
Feng, Wuwei ;
Hackney, David ;
Pani, Ethan ;
Schlaug, Gottfried .
STROKE, 2016, 47 (06) :1520-1526
[6]
MRI Biomarkers for Hand-Motor Outcome Prediction and Therapy Monitoring following Stroke.[J].U. Horn;M. Grothe;M. Lotze;Lijun Bai.Neural Plasticity.2016,
[7]
Predictability of Motor Outcome According to the Time of Motor Evoked Potentials From the Onset of Stroke in Patients With Putaminal Hemorrhage [J].
Kwon, Yong Min ;
Jang, Sung Ho ;
Lee, Jung Won .
ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2015, 39 (04) :553-559
[8]
A Standardized Approach to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Its Implications for Clinical Trials [J].
See, Jill ;
Dodakian, Lucy ;
Chou, Cathy ;
Chan, Vicky ;
McKenzie, Alison ;
Reinkensmeyer, David J. ;
Cramer, Steven C. .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2013, 27 (08) :732-741
[9]
The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke..[J].Stinear Cathy M;Barber P Alan;Petoe Matthew;Anwar Samir;Byblow Winston D.Brain : a journal of neurology.2012, Pt 8
[10]
Assessment of Upper Extremity Impairment; Function; and Activity After Stroke: Foundations for Clinical Decision Making.[J].Catherine E. Lang;Marghuretta D. Bland;Ryan R. Bailey;Sydney Y. Schaefer;Rebecca L. Birkenmeier.Journal of Hand Therapy.2012,