基于引文网络的知识扩散和整合研究——以供应链研究为例

被引：9

作者：

汤易兵

黄祖庆

张宝友

机构：

[1] 中国计量学院经济与管理学院

来源：

情报杂志 | 2012年 / 31卷 / 01期

关键词：

引文网络; 引文滞后; 知识扩散; 供应链;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

G350 [情报学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

跨学科研究的目的是有助于产业和经济的发展。然而,由于知识的扩张和研究领域之间的隔阂,不同研究领域之间知识的传播是稀少的。因此,我们需要一种方法来计量这种传播并且促进这种传播。通过引文网络分析,引入引文滞后这一指标来刻画供应链研究分支领域知识扩散的速度以及知识整合的情况。在此基础上,讨论了知识的结构以及供应链研究中分支领域之间的相互影响。该研究为分析和理解跨学科研究提供一种新的途径。

引用

页码：119 / 122

页数：4

共 10 条

[1]

Filling the gap between researchers studying different materials and different methods: a proposal for structured keywords. Y. Kajikawa,K. Abe,S. Noda. Journal of Information Science . 2006

[2]

Leydesdorff,L. The Challenge of Scientometrics. The Development, Measurement, and Self-organization of Scientific Communications . 1995

[3]

Who Talks to Whom? Intra-and Interdisciplinary Communication of Economics Journals. Pieters,Rik,Baumgartner,Hans. Journal of Econometrics . 2002

[4] Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity [J].

Porter, Alan L. ;

Cohen, Alex S. ;

Roessner, J. David ;

Perreault, Marty .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 2007, 72 (01) :117-147

[5]

Interdisciplinary Dynamics of ModernScience:Analysis of Cross-Disciplinary Citation Fiows. Van Leeuwen T,Tijssen R. Re-search Evaluation . 2000

[6] Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science [J].

Rinia, EJ ;

van Leeuwen, TN ;

Bruins, EEW ;

van Vuren, HG ;

van Raan, AFJ .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 54 (03) :347-362

[7]

A Quantitative Assessment of InterdisciplinaryStructures in Science and Technology:Co-classifi Cation Analy-sis of Energy Research. Tijssen R J W. Research Policy . 1992

[8] Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time [J].

Porter, Alan L. ;

Rafols, Ismael .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, 81 (03) :719-745

[9]

Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience[J] . Ismael Rafols,Martin Meyer. &nbspScientometrics . 2010 (2)

[10]

Dimensions of citation analysis. Leydesdorff,L.,Amsterdamska,O. Science and Technology . 1990

← 1 →