高强度间歇训练对青年肥胖女性腹部脂肪含量的影响

被引:127
作者
王京京
韩涵
张海峰
机构
[1] 河北师范大学体育学院
关键词
高强度间歇训练; 中强度持续训练; 腹部内脏脂肪; 腹部皮下脂肪; 肥胖;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R87 [运动医学];
学科分类号
100911 [运动医学];
摘要
目的:比较高强度间歇训练和中强度持续训练对青年肥胖女性腹部内脏和皮下脂肪含量的影响。方法:24名青年肥胖女性随机分为两组分别进行12周(4天/周)高强度间歇训练和中强度持续训练干预。高强度间歇训练组在跑台上以85%95%最大心率(HRpeak)运动4分钟接50%60%HRpeak运动3分钟后休息7分钟,重复4组;中强度持续训练组以60%70%HRpeak持续运动33分钟。两组均以50%60%HRpeak强度热身10分钟、整理活动5分钟。干预期间,受试者保持惯有的饮食和活动习惯。干预前后分别用计算机X线断层扫描测量腹部内脏和皮下脂肪面积、生物电阻抗法测试体脂百分比(fat%)。结果:干预前两组所有指标差异均无统计学意义。12周干预后,两组体重(高强度间歇训练:61.23±8.39 vs 66.37±9.34 kg;中强度持续训练:60.28±5.78 vs 64.81±6.10 kg,P<0.01)和fat%(高强度间歇训练:28.18%±3.93%vs 31.30%±3.63%;中强度持续训练:29.21%±2.43%vs 32.01%±2.41%,P<0.01)均较干预前显著下降,但下降幅度两组间差异无统计学意义;高强度间歇训练组腹部内脏脂肪面积较干预前显著下降(53.12±14.51 vs 64.86±17.46 cm2,P<0.01),中强度持续训练组干预前后差异无统计学意义(55.55±14.94 vs 60.41±15.45 cm2,P>0.05);两组腹部皮下脂肪面积均较干预前减少(高强度间歇训练:205.57±68.25 vs 255.29±77.38 cm2;中强度持续训练:204.02±55.74 vs 229.44±57.36 cm2,均P<0.01),但高强度间歇训练组减少幅度显著大于中强度持续训练组。结论:高强度间歇训练可以降低青年肥胖女性腹部内脏脂肪含量,而相同耗能量的中强度持续训练却无此效果;高强度间歇训练与中强度持续训练均可减少腹部皮下脂肪,但前者效果更明显;高强度间歇训练与中强度持续训练均可降低fat%,效果无显著性差异。
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 20+30 +30
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
Cardiac Rehabilitation in Chronic Heart Failure: Effect of an 8-Week; High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Continuous Training[J] Céline Freyssin;Chantal Verkindt;Fabrice Prieur;Philippe Benaich;Sébastien Maunier;Philippe Blanc Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012,
[2]
High intensity interval exercise training in overweight young women[J] Sijie; T;Hainai; Y;Fengying; Y;Jianxiong; W EN 2012,
[3]
Low-Volume Interval Training Improves Muscle Oxidative Capacity in Sedentary Adults[J] MELANIE S. HOOD;JONATHAN P. LITTLE;MARK A. TARNOPOLSKY;FRANK MYSLIK;MARTIN J. GIBALA Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2011,
[4]
A 45-Minute Vigorous Exercise Bout Increases Metabolic Rate for 14 Hours[J] AMY M. KNAB;R. ANDREW SHANELY;KAREN D. CORBIN;FUXIA JIN;WEI SHA;DAVID C. NIEMAN Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2011,
[5]
Acute Responses to High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise in CHD Patients[J] THIBAUT GUIRAUD;ANIL NIGAM;MARTIN JUNEAU;PHILIPPE MEYER;MATHIEU GAYDA;LAURENT BOSQUET Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2011,
[6]
High-intensity interval running is perceived to be more enjoyable than moderate-intensity continuous exercise: Implications for exercise adherence[J] JonathanD. Bartlett;GraemeL. Close;DonP. M. MacLaren;Warren Gregson;Barry Drust;JamesP. Morton Journal of Sports Sciences 2011,
[7]
Interval and Strength Training in CAD Patients[J] J. Helgerud;T. Karlsen;W. Y. Kim;K. L. H?ydal;A. St?ylen;H. Pedersen;L. Brix;S. Ringgaard;J. Kv?rness;J. Hoff Int J Sports Med 2011,
[8]
High-Intensity Training versus Traditional Exercise Interventions for Promoting Health[J] LARS NYBO;EMIL SUNDSTRUP;MARKUS D. JAKOBSEN;MAGNI MOHR;THERESE HORNSTRUP;LENE SIMONSEN;JENS BüLOW;MORTEN B. RANDERS;JENS J. NIELSEN;PER AAGAARD;PETER KRUSTRUP Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2010,
[9]
Effect of Exercise Training Intensity on Abdominal Visceral Fat and Body Composition[J] BRIAN A. IRVING;CHRISTOPHER K. DAVIS;DAVID W. BROCK;JUDY Y. WELTMAN;DAMON SWIFT;EUGENE J. BARRETT;GLENN A. GAESSER;ARTHUR WELTMAN Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2008,
[10]
Aerobic Interval Training Versus Continuous Moderate Exercise as a Treatment for the Metabolic Syndrome: A Pilot Study[J] Circulation 2008,