Using learning analytics to support students' engineering design: the angle of prediction

被引:9
作者
Xing, Wanli [1 ,2 ]
Pei, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Li, Shan [3 ]
Chen, Guanhua [2 ,4 ]
Xie, Charles [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Sch Teaching & Learning, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Learning Genome Collaborat, Natick, MA USA
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Educ & Counselling Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Concord Consortium, Concord, MA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Learning analytics; educational data mining; engineering design; predictive modeling; feature selection; algorithms; FEATURE-SELECTION;
D O I
10.1080/10494820.2019.1680391
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Engineering design plays an important role in education. However, due to its open nature and complexity, providing timely support to students has been challenging using the traditional assessment methods. This study takes an initial step to employ learning analytics to build performance prediction models to help struggling students. It allows instructors to offer in-time intervention and support for these at-risk students. Specifically, we develop a task model to characterize the engineering design process so that the data features can be associated with the abstract engineering design phases. A two-stage feature selection method is proposed to address the data sparsity and high dimensionality problems. Then, instead of relying on probability-based algorithms such as Bayesian Networks to represent the task model, this study used the Radial Basis Function based Support Vector Machines for prediction to identify the struggling students. Next, we employ an extra-tree classification method to rank the importance of these features. Teachers can integrate the feature importance ranking with the abstract task model to diagnose students' problems for scaffolding design. The results show that the proposed approach can outperform the baseline models as well as providing actionable insights for teachers to provide personalized and timely feedback to students. Implications of this study for research and practice are then discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:2594 / 2611
页数:18
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Principal component analysis [J].
Abdi, Herve ;
Williams, Lynne J. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2010, 2 (04) :433-459
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing EMNLP, DOI DOI 10.3115/V1/W14-4111
[3]  
Arastoopour G., 2015, Epistemic network analysis as a tool for engineering design assessment
[4]  
ATMAN CJ, 2015, AM SOC ENG ED C
[5]   Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners [J].
Atman, Cynthia J. ;
Adams, Robin S. ;
Cardella, Monica E. ;
Turns, Jennifer ;
Mosborg, Susan ;
Saleem, Jason .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 96 (04) :359-379
[6]   Characterizing Design Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study of Engineering Designers' Use of Language [J].
Atman, Cynthia J. ;
Kilgore, Deborah ;
McKenna, Ann .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2008, 97 (03) :309-326
[7]  
Baker R.S. J. d., 2010, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, P11
[8]   A survey on feature selection methods [J].
Chandrashekar, Girish ;
Sahin, Ferat .
COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 40 (01) :16-28
[9]   Tracking Knowledge Proficiency of Students with Educational Priors [J].
Chen, Yuying ;
Liu, Qi ;
Huang, Zhenya ;
Wu, Le ;
Chen, Enhong ;
Wu, Runze ;
Su, Yu ;
Hu, Guoping .
CIKM'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2017, :989-998
[10]   Learning from failure: a meta-analysis of the empirical studies [J].
Darabi, Aubteen ;
Arrington, Thomas Logan ;
Sayilir, Erkan .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 66 (05) :1101-1118