Equipoise in the enhanced supression of the platelet Ilb/IIIa receptor with Integrilin Trial (ESPRIT): a critical appraisal

被引:7
作者
Mann, H
London, AJ
Mann, J
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Philosophy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Ctr Advancement Appl Eth, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1191/1740774505cn086oa
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Enhanced Supression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Trial (ESPRIT) was a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial in which participants were randomized between eptifibatide and placebo. A "clinical hold" was initially placed on the trial by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which was concerned about the placebo-only control arm. The hold was lifted after additional information concerning the use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in clinical practice, derived from a survey of interventional cardiologists, was provided. The trial's principal investigator and colleagues have described how these issues were resolved, and advance a claim of equipoise for the trial. In this critical appraisal we examine the information and arguments proffered in support of the trial design and conclude that they evidence a misunderstanding of equipoise. We believe that a placebo-only control arm was not justified by the information provided by the trialists.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 241
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Equipoise, knowledge and ethics in clinical research and practice [J].
Ashcroft, R .
BIOETHICS, 1999, 13 (3-4) :314-326
[2]   The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect [J].
Davis, D ;
Evans, M ;
Jadad, A ;
Perrier, L ;
Rath, D ;
Ryan, D ;
Sibbald, G ;
Straus, S ;
Rappolt, S ;
Wowk, M ;
Zwarenstein, M .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7405) :33-35
[3]   Acknowledgment of uncertainty: a fundamental means to ensure scientific and ethical validity in clinical research. [J].
Djulbegovic B. .
Current Oncology Reports, 2001, 3 (5) :389-395
[4]   The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals [J].
Edwards, SJL ;
Lilford, RJ ;
Hewison, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7167) :1209-1212
[5]   Use of evidence-based medical therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization in the United States, Europe, and Canada [J].
Eisenberg, MJ ;
Califf, RM ;
Cohen, EA ;
Adelman, AG ;
Mark, DB ;
Topol, EJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 79 (07) :867-872
[6]   What makes clinical research ethical? [J].
Emanuel, EJ ;
Wendler, D ;
Grady, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (20) :2701-2711
[7]  
*EUR AG EV MED PRO, 2000, POINTS CONS SWITCH 1
[8]  
Ferguson JJ, 2000, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V12, P317
[9]   EQUIPOISE AND THE ETHICS OF CLINICAL RESEARCH [J].
FREEDMAN, B .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 317 (03) :141-145
[10]  
Freedman B, 1992, J Clin Ethics, V3, P231