What is the role of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing colorectal surgery? Authors reply

被引:102
作者
Platell, C
Hall, J
机构
[1] University Department of Surgery, Fremantle Hospital, Royal Perth Hosptial, Perth, WA
关键词
Anastomotic leakage; Colon surgery; Mechanical bowel preparation; Rectal surgery; Wound infection;
D O I
10.1007/BF02235369
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Most surgeons use mechanical bowel preparation before performing operations on the colon and rectum. The aim of this study is to determine if there is any published literature that supports this practice. METHODS: We undertook a review of the literature on the benefits of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing surgery on the colon and rectum. A meta-analysis was conducted on all available clinical trials addressing this issue. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of three clinical trials revealed a significantly greater incidence of wound infection in patients who received a mechanical bowel preparation (10.8 vs. 7.4 percent; P < 0.002; 95 percent confidence interval of the difference, - 1.6-8.4 percent). Patients who received mechanical bowel preparation had an incidence of anastomotic leakage that was twice that of control patients; however, this difference was not significant (8.1 vs. 4 percent; P < 0.114; 95 percent confidence interval of the difference, -0.4-8.4 percent). CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence in the literature to support the use of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Hence, there is a need for clinical trials comparing the more traditional, aggressive forms of bowel preparation (e.g., polyethylene glycol solutions, sodium phosphate) with either no preparation or simpler techniques, such as a single phosphate enema.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 883
页数:1
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   COLON WOUND MANAGEMENT AND PROGRADE COLONIC LAVAGE IN LARGE-BOWEL TRAUMA [J].
BAKER, LW ;
THOMSON, SR ;
CHADWICK, SJD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 77 (08) :872-876
[2]   RELATIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF PREOPERATIVE ORAL ANTIBIOTICS, MECHANICAL BOWEL PREPARATION, AND PREOPERATIVE PERITONEAL CONTAMINATION IN AVOIDANCE OF SEPSIS AFTER RADICAL SURGERY FOR ULCERATIVE COLITIS AND CROHNS DISEASE OF LARGE BOWEL [J].
BARKER, K ;
GRAHAM, NG ;
MASON, MC ;
DEDOMBAL, FT ;
GOLIGHER, JC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1971, 58 (04) :270-&
[3]  
BARTLETT JG, 1978, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V113, P853
[4]   A SURVEY OF CLINICAL-TRIALS OF ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS IN COLON SURGERY - EVIDENCE AGAINST FURTHER USE OF NO-TREATMENT CONTROLS [J].
BAUM, ML ;
ANISH, DS ;
CHALMERS, TC ;
SACKS, HS ;
SMITH, H ;
FAGERSTROM, RM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1981, 305 (14) :795-799
[5]  
BECK DE, 1991, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V126, P552
[6]   COMPARISON OF CLEANSING METHODS IN PREPARATION FOR COLONIC SURGERY [J].
BECK, DE ;
HARFORD, FJ ;
DIPALMA, JA .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1985, 28 (07) :491-495
[7]  
BENTLEY DW, 1972, J LAB CLIN MED, V79, P421
[8]  
BORNSIDE GH, 1969, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V57, P569
[9]  
Brownson P, 1992, BRIT J SURG, V79, P461
[10]  
BURCH JM, 1991, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V126, P979