Cost Comparison Between Watchful Waiting With Active Surveillance and Active Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

被引:38
作者
Corcoran, Anthony T. [1 ]
Peele, Pamela B.
Benoit, Ronald M.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; ANTIGEN; INTERVENTION; CARCINOMA; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2009.12.071
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES In part because of concern regarding overtreatment in men with prostate cancer, watchful waiting with active surveillance (WWAS) has been increasingly used in men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. The present study investigates the difference in costs between men with low-risk prostate cancer treated with up-front radical prostatectomy (RP) versus WWAS. METHODS A cost model was constructed using data from centers that have published their results in men who were followed up with WWAS compared with the actual costs of up-front RP calculated from a high volume center. Two WWAS arms of 15-year duration were created in which the follow-up protocol and conversion rate to active treatment were varied. RESULTS The cost of up-front RP including costs of surgery, complications, and follow up for 15 years was $15 235 per person. Costs of WWAS were estimated using annual conversion rates from WWAS to RP of both 5% and 7%. Costs per person in the WWAS arms ranged from $6558 to $11 992 in the scenarios created which represent a 43%-78.7% reduction in costs when compared with men undergoing up-front RP. CONCLUSIONS Watchful waiting with active surveillance is being increasingly used in hopes of decreasing the potential overtreatment of prostate cancer in men with low-risk disease. The present study suggests that WWAS is likely to markedly decrease costs when compared with active treatment with RP. UROLOGY 76: 703-709, 2010. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 707
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] 20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer
    Albertsen, PC
    Hanley, JA
    Fine, J
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (17): : 2095 - 2101
  • [2] Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    Grubb, Robert L., III
    Buys, Saundra S.
    Chia, David
    Church, Timothy R.
    Fouad, Mona N.
    Gelmann, Edward P.
    Kvale, Paul A.
    Reding, Douglas J.
    Weissfeld, Joel L.
    Yokochi, Lance A.
    Crawford, E. David
    O'Brien, Barbara
    Clapp, Jonathan D.
    Rathmell, Joshua M.
    Riley, Thomas L.
    Hayes, Richard B.
    Kramer, Barnett S.
    Izmirlian, Grant
    Miller, Anthony B.
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    Prorok, Philip C.
    Gohagan, John K.
    Berg, Christine D.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (13) : 1310 - 1319
  • [3] What percentage of patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate are candidates for surveillance?: An analysis of the CaPSURE™ database
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Smith, Joseph A.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (04) : 1330 - 1334
  • [4] A quantitative analysis of the costs and benefits of prostate cancer screening
    Benoit, RM
    Grönberg, H
    Naslund, MJ
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2001, 4 (03) : 138 - 145
  • [5] Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: Preliminary results
    Carter, HB
    Walsh, PC
    Landis, P
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03) : 1231 - 1234
  • [6] Feasibility study: Watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression
    Choo, R
    Klotz, L
    Danjoux, C
    Morton, GC
    DeBoer, G
    Szumacher, E
    Fleshner, N
    Bunting, P
    Hruby, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) : 1664 - 1669
  • [7] Risk Assessment for Prostate Cancer Metastasis and Mortality at the Time of Diagnosis
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Broering, Jeanette M.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (12): : 878 - 887
  • [8] Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort
    Dall'Era, Marc A.
    Konety, Badrinath R.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Stauf, Frank
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Meng, Maxwell V.
    Kane, Christopher J.
    Perez, Nanette
    Master, Viraj A.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. CANCER, 2008, 112 (12) : 2664 - 2670
  • [9] Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer - Review of the current literature
    Dall'Era, Marc A.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Chan, June M.
    Davies, Benjamin J.
    Albertsen, Peter C.
    Klotz, Laurence H.
    Warlick, Christopher A.
    Holmberg, Lars
    Bailey, Donald E., Jr.
    Wallace, Meredith E.
    Kantoff, Philip W.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. CANCER, 2008, 112 (08) : 1650 - 1659
  • [10] Outcomes and follow-up strategies for patients on active surveillance
    Dall'Era, Marc A.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) : 258 - 262