Loss of knee range of motion in leg lengthening - Response

被引:35
作者
Barker, KL
Simpson, AHRW
Lamb, SE
机构
[1] Physiotherapy Research Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Ctr. NHS Trust
关键词
Femoral lengthening; Ilizarov; Joint range; Physical therapy;
D O I
10.2519/jospt.2001.31.5.238
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Prospective longitudinal study. Objective: To determine factors predictive of loss of movement in a cohort of patients undergoing femoral lengthening. Background: Loss of joint movement due to poor adaptation of the muscle is a major problem during limb lengthening but remains poorly documented in the literature. Methods and Materials: A validated technique using a modified goniometer was used to measure knee motion. Measurements were taken before surgery, prelengthening, during lengthening, and at 6 and 12 months post frame removal. The subjects were 35 patients with a mean age of 22 years (±12.8 years), 23 men and 12 women, undergoing femoral lengthening by the Ilizarov method. Results: The pattern of recovery of knee range of movement that was observed showed that 88% of knee flexion was regained by 6 months, 92% of patients regained their knee flexion by 12 months, and 97% by 18 months. Significant loss of knee flexion occurred in the latent period prior to lengthening, mean loss 79° (±22.8°). All patients regained full knee extension by the end of lengthening, but 2 patients who had fixed flexion deformities of > 40° developed posterior subluxation of the knee. Conclusions: The unexpected loss of movement observed in the prelengthening period indicates that physical therapy efforts must be directed to this phase in order to accelerate the recovery of joint range and reduce the muscle-related complications that can occur during limb lengthening.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 246
页数:1
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
ALTMAN DG, 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P300
[2]
Repeatability of goniometer measurements of the knee in patients wearing an Ilizarov external fixator: a clinic-based study [J].
Barker, KL ;
Lamb, SE ;
Burns, M ;
Simpson, AHRW .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 1999, 13 (02) :156-163
[3]
BARKER KL, 2000, CLIN GUIDELINES PHYS
[4]
COMPARISON OF KNEE MOTION AND CALLUS FORMATION IN FEMORAL LENGTHENING WITH THE WAGNER OR MONOLATERAL-RING DEVICE [J].
BOWEN, JR ;
LEVY, EJ ;
DONOHUE, M .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 1993, 13 (04) :467-472
[5]
PHYSICAL THERAPY MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING LIMB LENGTHENING BY DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS [J].
COGLIANESE, DB ;
HERZENBERG, JE ;
GOULET, JA .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1993, 17 (03) :124-132
[6]
Curran AR, 1999, J PEDIATR ORTHOPED, V19, P386
[7]
Folkerts C, 1992, Rehab Manag, V5, P126
[8]
GREEN SA, 1991, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V22, P723
[9]
HERZENBERG JE, 1994, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P49
[10]
AN ELECTROGONIOMETRIC STUDY OF KNEE MOTION IN NORMAL GAIT [J].
KETTELKAMP, DB ;
JOHNSON, RJ ;
SMIDT, GL ;
CHAO, EYS ;
WALKER, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1970, A 52 (04) :775-+