Accurate deployment of vena cava filters: Comparison of intravascular ultrasound and contrast venography

被引:28
作者
Ashley, DW
Gamblin, TC
Burch, ST
Solis, MM
机构
[1] Med Ctr Cent Georgia, Macon, GA 31208 USA
[2] Mercer Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Macon, GA 31207 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE | 2001年 / 50卷 / 06期
关键词
vena cava filter; contrast venography; intravascular ultrasound;
D O I
10.1097/00005373-200106000-00002
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: The increasing use of vena cava filters by trauma surgeons has led to reports of filter placement using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), Although attractive because of its ease of use and elimination of contrast and radiation, no studies have examined the accuracy of filter placement by IVUS as compared with contrast venography (CV), The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomic information obtained by both techniques during filter placement. Methods: Twenty-one patients meeting trauma service criteria for filter placement were studied (11 women and 10 men; mean age, 46.8 years). All procedures were performed in the operating room by trauma surgeons. Vascular access was obtained by percutaneous placement of an 8 French sheath in the right femoral vein. CV, IVUS, and bilateral selective renal venography were performed before deployment of a Greenfield filter, Localization and diameter measurements were made in reference to a radiopaque ruler placed on the patient's abdomen. We chose the "best location" for filter deployment as 1 cm below the junction of the lowest renal vein and the vena cava. Measurements by CV and IVUS were compared with the "gold standard" of selective renal venography. Results: As compared with selective renal venography, the difference between best location by CV and IVUS was 16.3 +/- 13.8 mm and 3.7 +/- 5.6 mm, respectively (p = 0.001), In four cases (19%) the CV missed best location by 3 cm or more. CV overestimated the diameter of the vena cava in all cases. Average vena cava diameter was 26.4 +/- 3.3 mm by venography and 20.6 +/- 3.1 mm by IVUS (p < 0.0001), CV incorrectly identified four patients as having vena cava diameters too large (>2.8 cm) for the placement of a Greenfield filter. The two renal vein anomalies (one double left renal vein and one absent left renal vein) were correctly diagnosed by IVUS, Conclusion: IVUS is a more accurate method of localizing the renal veins and measuring vena cava diameter for placement of vena cava filters than contrast venography.
引用
收藏
页码:975 / 979
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BERNSTEIN MJ, 1986, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V256, P744
[2]   Intravascular ultrasound as an alternative to positive-contrast vena cavography prior to filter placement [J].
Bonn, J ;
Liu, JB ;
Eschelman, DJ ;
Sullivan, KL ;
Pinheiro, LW ;
Gardiner, GA .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (07) :843-849
[3]   Accuracy and safety of carbon dioxide inferior vena cavography [J].
Boyd-Kranis, R ;
Sullivan, KL ;
Eschelman, DJ ;
Bonn, J ;
Gardiner, GA .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (09) :1183-1189
[4]   Determination of inferior vena cava diameter in the angiography suite: Comparison of three common methods [J].
Brown, DB ;
Labuski, MR ;
Cardella, JF ;
Singh, H ;
Waybill, PN .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (02) :143-147
[5]  
CAPRINI JA, 1983, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V156, P599
[6]   COMPLICATIONS ENCOUNTERED WITH THE USE OF THE GREENFIELD FILTER [J].
CARABASI, RA ;
MORITZ, MJ ;
JARRELL, BE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 154 (02) :163-168
[7]   EFFICACY OF DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS PROPHYLAXIS IN TRAUMA PATIENTS AND IDENTIFICATION OF HIGH-RISK GROUPS [J].
DENNIS, JW ;
MENAWAT, S ;
VONTHRON, J ;
FALLON, WF ;
VINSANT, GO ;
LANEVE, LM ;
JAGGER, C ;
FRYKBERG, ER ;
RIVKIND, AI ;
ROETTEGER, RH ;
EASTMAN, AB ;
WATKINS, G ;
SHATNEY, CH ;
GABRAM, S ;
MENDELSON, JA ;
COHN, SM .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1993, 35 (01) :132-139
[8]   Vena cava duplex imaging before caval interruption [J].
Friedland, M ;
Kazmers, A ;
Kline, R ;
Groehn, H ;
Meeker, C ;
Despriet, S ;
Abson, K ;
Oust, G .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 24 (04) :608-612
[9]   THE DETECTION AND PREVENTION OF PULMONARY-EMBOLISM IN TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT - A STUDY COMPARING ASPIRIN AND LOW-DOSE WARFARIN [J].
GUYER, RD ;
BOOTH, RE ;
ROTHMAN, RH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1982, 64 (07) :1040-1044
[10]   Prospective anatomic study of the inferior vena cava and renal veins: Comparison of selective renal venography with cavography and relevance in filter placement [J].
Hicks, ME ;
Malden, ES ;
Vesely, TM ;
Picus, D ;
Darcy, MD .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1995, 6 (05) :721-729