Extraperitoneal endoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection: A review of 125 patients

被引:14
作者
Raboy, A [1 ]
Adler, H [1 ]
Albert, P [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY HLTH SCI CTR,BROOKLYN,NY 11203
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; lymph node excision; laparoscopy;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68195-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the efficacy of a totally extraperitoneal approach to endoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection. Materials and Methods: Extraperitoneal endoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 125 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. All patients were candidates for brachytherapy, cryotherapy or radical perineal prostatectomy. The first 65 patients underwent lymphadenectomy regardless of local clinical stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA) or tumor grade. The last 60 patients met 2 of 3 selection criteria, consisting of clinical local stage T2b or greater, prostate specific antigen greater than 20 and Gleason score 7 or higher. Patients were evaluated for morbidity and mortality, nodal yield, operative time, conversion rate to transperitoneal laparoscopic or open lymphadenectomy and hospital stay. Results: Mean operative time was 104 minutes, mean length of stay was 2.1 days and mean nodal yield was 10.2. Of the patients 19.2% had positive nodes, and positive nodal yield increased to 32.9% when selection criteria were used. Of the cases 4% were converted to a transabdominal laparoscopic approach and 2.4% to open lymphadenectomy. Symptomatic lymphoceles required percutaneous drainage in 2.4% of the patients. One patient died of massive pulmonary embolism. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the extraperitoneal endoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection is an effective and relatively safe method of surgically staging prostate cancer. It compares favorably to other methods of surgical staging.
引用
收藏
页码:2202 / 2204
页数:3
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA - RELATIONSHIP OF GRADE AND LOCAL EXTENT TO PATTERN OF METASTASES [J].
BARZELL, W ;
BEAN, MA ;
HILARIS, BS ;
WHITMORE, WF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1977, 118 (02) :278-282
[2]   STAGING PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - RISK VERSUS BENEFIT [J].
BRENDLER, CB ;
CLEEVE, LK ;
ANDERSON, EE ;
PAULSON, DF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1980, 124 (06) :849-850
[3]  
CATALONA WJ, 1983, J UROLOGY, V127, P460
[4]  
Ferzli G, 1992, J Laparoendosc Surg, V2, P219, DOI 10.1089/lps.1992.2.219
[5]  
Ferzli G, 1992, J Laparoendosc Surg, V2, P39, DOI 10.1089/lps.1992.2.39
[6]   SURGICAL STAGING OF PROSTATIC CANCER - TRANSPERITONEAL VERSUS EXTRAPERITONEAL LYMPHADENECTOMY [J].
FREIHA, FS ;
SALZMAN, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1977, 118 (04) :616-617
[7]  
HAKIM LS, 1993, J UROL 2, V148, pA415
[8]  
KAVOUSSI LR, 1993, J UROLOGY, V149, P322, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36069-X
[9]   ABILITY OF PREOPERATIVE SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN VALUE TO PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STAGE AND DNA PLOIDY - INFLUENCE OF CLINICAL STAGE AND TUMOR GRADE [J].
KLEER, E ;
LARSONKELLER, JJ ;
ZINCKE, H ;
OESTERLING, JE .
UROLOGY, 1993, 41 (03) :207-216
[10]   PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR STAGING CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER - INDICATIONS, COMPLICATIONS, AND RESULTS IN 217 CASES [J].
MCDOWELL, GC ;
JOHNSON, JW ;
TENNEY, DM ;
JOHNSON, DE .
UROLOGY, 1990, 35 (06) :476-482