Ultrasonographic assessment of amniotic fluid does not reflect actual amniotic fluid volume

被引:37
作者
Chauhan, SP
Magann, EF
Morrison, JC
Whitworth, NS
Hendrix, NW
Devoe, LD
机构
[1] USN HOSP,SAN DIEGO,CA 92134
[2] UNIV MISSISSIPPI,JACKSON,MS 39216
关键词
amniotic fluid index; amniotic fluid volume;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70189-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the ability of two methods of amniotic fluid assessment (two-diameter amniotic fluid pocket versus the amniotic fluid index) to predict oligohydramnios (actual amniotic fluid volume <500 ml) or polyhydramnios (actual amniotic fluid volume >1500 ml). STUDY DESIGN: The amniotic fluid index and the two-diameter amniotic fluid pocket were assessed before amniocentesis and determination of amniotic fluid volume with the dye (aminohippurate sodium) - dilution technique. To assess the detection of either oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios, the areas under the receiver-operator characteristic curves (+/-SE) were estimated by the point-to-point trapezoidal method of integration. Prediction limits were calculated by regression analysis of amniotic fluid index or two-diameter amniotic fluid pocket versus actual amniotic fluid volume and determination of 95th percentile ranges for amniotic fluid volume. RESULTS: We studied 144 patients with a mean (+/-SD) gestational age of 31.7 +/- 5.5 weeks; mean (+/-SD) amniotic fluid index and two-diameter amniotic fluid pocket were 12.6 +/- 6.1 cm and 21.2 +/- 18.4 cm(2), respectively. Mean (+/-SD) actual amniotic fluid volume was 722 +/- 735 ml (range 101 to 4318 ml). The areas under the four receiver-operator characteristic curves were not significantly different from the nondiagnostic line (p < 0.05). Regression slopes (r values) for amniotic fluid index and two-diameter amniotic fluid pocket versus actual amniotic fluid volume were 0.34 and 0.23, respectively. Calculation of the prediction limit for 95% confidence that oligohydramnios is absent requires that the amniotic fluid index be 30 cm and the two-dimension amniotic fluid pocket be 90 cm(2), both-thresholds of which are currently considered to represent clinical polyhydramnios. CONCLUSIONS: Both amniotic fluid index and two-dimension amniotic fluid pocket appear to be inaccurate predictors of actual oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios when compared with dye-dilution calculations of actual amniotic fluid volume.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 296
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   THE IMPACT OF AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUME ASSESSED INTRAPARTUM ON PERINATAL OUTCOME [J].
BARON, C ;
MORGAN, MA ;
GARITE, TJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (01) :167-174
[2]  
BECK JR, 1986, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V110, P13
[3]   NORMAL AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUME CHANGES THROUGHOUT PREGNANCY [J].
BRACE, RA ;
WOLF, EJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 161 (02) :382-388
[4]  
BRADY K, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V79, P234
[5]   ULTRASOUND EVALUATION OF AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUME .1. THE RELATIONSHIP OF MARGINAL AND DECREASED AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUMES TO PERINATAL OUTCOME [J].
CHAMBERLAIN, PF ;
MANNING, FA ;
MORRISON, I ;
HARMAN, CR ;
LANGE, IR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1984, 150 (03) :245-249
[6]   PRELIMINARY DATA ON USE OF SODIUM AMINOHIPPURATE TO DETERMINE AMNIOTIC FLUID VOLUMES [J].
CHARLES, D ;
JACOBY, HE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1966, 95 (02) :266-&
[7]  
CHAUHAN SP, 1995, OBSTET GYNECOL, V85, P9
[8]   DO SEMIQUANTITATIVE AMNIOTIC-FLUID INDEXES REFLECT ACTUAL VOLUME [J].
CROOM, CS ;
BANIAS, BB ;
RAMOSSANTOS, E ;
DEVOE, LD ;
BEZHADIAN, A ;
HIETT, AK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 167 (04) :995-999
[9]   AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUME ASSESSMENT - COMPARISON OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATES VERSUS DIRECT MEASUREMENTS WITH A DYE-DILUTION TECHNIQUE IN HUMAN-PREGNANCY [J].
DILDY, GA ;
LIRA, N ;
MOISE, KJ ;
RIDDLE, GD ;
DETER, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 167 (04) :986-994
[10]   CORRELATION OF MEASURED AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUME AND SONOGRAPHIC PREDICTIONS OF OLIGOHYDRAMNIOS [J].
HORSAGER, R ;
NATHAN, L ;
LEVENO, KJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 83 (06) :955-958