Effects of epinephrine, norepinephrine, or the combination of norepinephrine and dobutamine on gastric mucosa in septic shock

被引:100
作者
Duranteau, J
Sitbon, P
Teboul, JL
Vicaut, E
Anguel, N
Richard, C
Samii, K
机构
[1] Hop Bicetre, Dept Anesthesie Reanimat, F-94275 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[2] Hop Fernand Widal, Lab Etud Microcirculat, INSERM 141, Paris, France
[3] Hop Bicetre, Dept Reanimat Med, F-94275 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
关键词
gastric mucosal perfusion; septic shock; epinephrine; norepinephrine; dobutamine; gastric intramucosal pH;
D O I
10.1097/00003246-199905000-00021
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare in the same patient with septic shock, respective effects of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and the combination of norepinephrine and dobutamine (5 mu g/kg/min) on systemic hemodynamic parameters and gastric mucosal perfusion using gastric tonometry and laser-Doppler flowmetry techniques. Design: Prospective, controlled, randomized, crossover study. Setting: University hospital intensive care unit. Patients: Twelve patients with septic shack. Interventions: Each patient received in a random succession epinephrine, norepinephrine, and norepinephrine plus dobutamine. Dosages of epinephrine and norepinephrine were adjusted to achieve a mean arterial pressure between 70 and 80 mm Hg. A laser-Doppler probe and a tonometer were introduced into the gastric lumen. Measurements and Main Results: The increase in gastric mucosal perfusion detected by laser-Doppler flowmetry was higher with epinephrine and the combination of norepinephrine and dobutamine than with norepinephrine alone (p < .05). In addition, the ratio of gastric mucosal perfusion (local oxygen delivery) to systemic oxygen delivery was increased after norepinephrine plus dobutamine as compared with norepinephrine alone and epinephrine (p < .05). Although values of intramucosal pH and gastroarterial P-CO2 tended to be higher with norepinephrine plus dobutamine compared with those obtained with norepinephrine and epinephrine, differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: For the same mean arterial pressure in patients with septic shock, our study showed that administration of epinephrine increased gastric mucosal perfusion more than norepinephrine administration alone. Addition of dobutamine (5 mu g/kg/min) to norepinephrine improved gastric mucosal perfusion. This result could be explained by a vasodilating effect of dobutamine on gastric mucosal microcirculation.
引用
收藏
页码:893 / 900
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] ASTIZ M, 1988, CIRC SHOCK, V26, P311
  • [2] EFFECTS OF EPINEPHRINE ON HEMODYNAMICS AND OXYGEN-METABOLISM IN DOPAMINE-RESISTANT SEPTIC SHOCK
    BOLLAERT, PE
    BAUER, P
    AUDIBERT, G
    LAMBERT, H
    LARCAN, A
    [J]. CHEST, 1990, 98 (04) : 949 - 953
  • [4] Clark C H, 1992, Am J Crit Care, V1, P53
  • [5] A REAPPRAISAL OF NOREPINEPHRINE THERAPY IN HUMAN SEPTIC SHOCK
    DESJARS, P
    PINAUD, M
    POTEL, G
    TASSEAU, F
    TOUZE, MD
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1987, 15 (02) : 134 - 137
  • [6] Assessment of gastric mucosal perfusion during simulated hypovolemia in healthy volunteers
    Duranteau, J
    Sitbon, P
    Vicaut, E
    DescorpsDeclere, A
    Vigue, B
    Samii, K
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 154 (06) : 1653 - 1657
  • [7] ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN INTRAMUCOSAL ACIDOSIS IN THE GUT AND ORGAN FAILURE
    FIDDIANGREEN, RG
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1993, 21 (02) : S103 - S107
  • [9] GASTRIC INTRAMUCOSAL PH AS A THERAPEUTIC INDEX OF TISSUE OXYGENATION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    GUTIERREZ, G
    PALIZAS, F
    DOGLIO, G
    WAINSZTEIN, N
    GALLESIO, A
    PACIN, J
    DUBIN, A
    SCHIAVI, E
    JORGE, M
    PUSAJO, J
    KLEIN, F
    ROMAN, ES
    DORFMAN, B
    SHOTTLENDER, J
    GINIGER, R
    [J]. LANCET, 1992, 339 (8787) : 195 - 199
  • [10] EFFECT OF DOBUTAMINE ON OXYGEN-CONSUMPTION AND GASTRIC-MUCOSAL PH IN SEPTIC PATIENTS
    GUTIERREZ, G
    CLARK, C
    BROWN, SD
    PRICE, K
    ORTIZ, L
    NELSON, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 150 (02) : 324 - 329