The significance of theories in behavioural ecology for solving problems in applied ethology - Possibilities and limitations

被引:21
作者
Andersen, IL
Naevdal, E
Boe, KE
Bakken, M
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Anim & Aquacultural Sci, N-1432 As, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Econ & Resource Management, N-1432 As, Norway
关键词
behavioural ecology; optimality modelling; game theory; domestic animals;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2005.11.020
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to provide a discussion about the significance of using a theoretical framework from behavioural ecology in solving problems in applied ethology. The theoretical approach in behavioural ecology involves costs and benefits of behavioural decisions made by an individual of a particular species in one particular environment. Optimality models seek to predict which trade-offs between costs and benefits will give the maximum net benefit to the individual. Game and ecological theories on habitat choice, resource defence and use of space according to resource distribution and competitive abilities are examples of theoretical frameworks that could serve as useful approaches when studying farm animal behaviour. The main differences between wild and domestic species are different selection pressures and environmental constraints. However, there is little evidence that domestication has resulted in loss of behaviours from the species repertoire, that addition of new behaviours has occurred or that farm animals are incapable of making optimal decisions in their environment. In nearly all cases, behavioural differences between wild and domestic stocks are quantitative in character and best explained by differences in response thresholds (differences in frequencies of behavioural components). Except for animals kept on pasture, groups of domestic animals are most commonly kept in a closed space where there is no or little option to leave or modify the environment. Individuals in these groups are not able to choose their flock mates, nor can they manipulate the group size, and resources in the environment are often limited and defendable. Still, the fact that they live in an artificial environment is not in itself an argument against using domestic species as model animals for basic research questions. It is possible to make a similar framework and economical models as the ones used in behavioural ecology that include assumptions fitted to the domestic species and the artificial environment, and the present paper provides some examples of that. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 104
页数:20
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   The effects of weight asymmetry and resource distribution on aggression in groups of unacquainted pigs [J].
Andersen, IL ;
Andenæs, H ;
Boe, KE ;
Jensen, P ;
Bakken, M .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2000, 68 (02) :107-120
[2]   Aggression and group size in domesticated pigs, Sus scrofa:: 'when the winner takes it all and the loser is standing small' [J].
Andersen, IL ;
Nævdal, E ;
Bakken, M ;
Boe, KE .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2004, 68 :965-975
[3]   The influence of different feeding arrangements and food type on competition at feeding in pregnant sows [J].
Andersen, IL ;
Boe, KE ;
Kristiansen, AL .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1999, 65 (02) :91-104
[4]   Domestication effects on foraging strategies in fowl [J].
Andersson, M ;
Nordin, E ;
Jensen, P .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2001, 72 (01) :51-62
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology
[6]  
BAKKEN M, 1998, P 6 WORLD C GEN APPL, V27, P381
[7]   QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND EVOLUTION - IS OUR UNDERSTANDING OF GENETICS SUFFICIENT TO EXPLAIN EVOLUTION [J].
BEILHARZ, RG ;
LUXFORD, BG ;
WILKINSON, JL .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR TIERZUCHTUNG UND ZUCHTUNGSBIOLOGIE, 1993, 110 (03) :161-170
[8]   INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF PREDATORS IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT [J].
BERNSTEIN, C ;
KACELNIK, A ;
KREBS, JR .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1988, 57 (03) :1007-1026
[9]   BEHAVIORAL-DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LAYING HEN POPULATIONS SELECTED FOR HIGH AND LOW EFFICIENCY OF FOOD UTILIZATION [J].
BRAASTAD, BO ;
KATLE, J .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1989, 30 (03) :533-544
[10]   What makes free-range broiler chickens range? In situ measurement of habitat preference [J].
Dawkins, MS ;
Cook, PA ;
Whittingham, MJ ;
Mansell, KA ;
Harper, AE .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2003, 66 :151-160