Eformoterol Turbohaler® compared with salmeterol by dry powder inhaler in asthmatic children not controlled on inhaled corticosteroids

被引:12
作者
Everden, P
Campbell, M
Harnden, C
McGoldrick, H
Bodalia, B
Manion, V
Reynia, S
机构
[1] Birchwood Med Surg, N Walsham NR28 0BQ, Norfolk, England
[2] Southbank Surg, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Prescott Surg, Baschurch, Shrops, England
[4] Downpatrick Hlth Ctr, Downpatrick, Down, North Ireland
[5] Gables Medictr, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[6] AstraZeneca UK Ltd, Luton, Beds, England
关键词
inhaled beta(2)-agonists; formoterol; inhaled corticosteroids; asthma; children;
D O I
10.1046/j.0905-6157.2003.00094.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of the inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonists eformoterol and salmeterol when added to existing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy in symptomatic asthmatic children. This randomized, 12-week, parallel-group study, performed in a primary care setting, included 156 children and adolescents (aged 6-17 years) with moderate persistent asthma. Patients were randomized to open-label eformoterol (Oxis(R)) Turbohaler(R) 9 mug (delivered dose) or salmeterol Acculialer(R) 50 mug, both b.i.d, added to current ICS. Assessments included: changes in daytime reliever beta(2)-agonist therapy (primary variable), total 24-h reliever use, lung function, clinic and diary symptom scores, patient and carer health-related quality of life (HRQL) and adverse events. Daytime reliever use decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from baseline by 65% and 52%, respectively in the eformoterol and salmeterol treatment groups. Compared with salmeterol, eformoterol produced a greater decrease in daytime (-0.46 inhalations/ day; p = 0.081) and 24-h (-0.70 inhalations/day; p = 0.043) reliever use. The percentage of patients who did not require any reliever medication during the study was significantly higher in the eformoterol group (p < 0.05 vs. salmeterol at weeks 8 and 12). Clinic and diary card peak expiratory flow and symptom measures all improved from baseline in both treatment arms. There was a significantly greater effect in favour of eformoterol for the reduction in clinic-assessed overall night-time symptoms (p < 0.05 vs. salmeterol). Clinically relevant improvements in patient-assessed HRQL occurred during treatment with eformoterol and salmeterol, but carer-assessed HRQL was improved to a clinically relevant extent, only with eformoterol. Both treatments were well tolerated. In children and adolescents with moderate persistent asthma, add-on therapy with eformoterol was well tolerated and at least as effective as salmeterol.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 47
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Bisgaard H, 2000, PEDIATR PULM, V29, P221, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(200003)29:3<221::AID-PPUL11>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-P
[3]  
Boulet L P, 2001, Can Respir J, V8 Suppl A, p5A
[4]   A comparison of the efficacy of long-acting β2-agonists:: eformoterol via Turbohaler® and salmeterol via pressurized metered dose inhaler or Accuhaler®, in mild to moderate asthmatics [J].
Campbell, LM ;
Anderson, TJ ;
Parashchak, MR ;
Burke, CM ;
Watson, SA ;
Turbitt, ML .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 1999, 93 (04) :236-244
[5]  
*JOINT HLTH SURV U, 1998, HLTH SURV ENGL 1996
[6]   Measuring quality of life in the parents of children with asthma [J].
Juniper, EF ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Feeny, DH ;
Ferrie, PJ ;
Griffith, LE ;
Townsend, M .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (01) :27-34
[7]   EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SALMETEROL IN CHILDHOOD ASTHMA [J].
LENNEY, W ;
PEDERSEN, S ;
BONER, AL ;
EBBUTT, A ;
JENKINS, MM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1995, 154 (12) :983-990
[8]   LONG-TERM CIRCADIAN EFFECTS OF SALMETEROL IN ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN TREATED WITH INHALED CORTICOSTEROIDS [J].
MEIJER, GG ;
POSTMA, DD ;
MULDER, PGH ;
VANAALDEREN, WMC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 152 (06) :1887-1892
[9]  
*NAT ASTHM CAMP, 1999, ASTHMA AGENDA JUN
[10]  
*NAT ASTHM CAMP, 1995, BLUE PET ASTHM SURV