Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: Misallocation of variance revisited

被引:27
作者
Achim, A
Marcantoni, W
机构
[1] Lab. de Neuroscience de la Cognition, Université du Québec, Montréal, Que.
[2] LNC/UQAM, Montréal, Que. H3C 3P8, succursale Centre-Ville
关键词
event-related potentials; principal component analysis; topographic component model;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb01746.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Misallocating variance, in event-related potential analysis, refers to attributing an experimental effect to components not actually affected. A vector interpretation of the relationship between mathematically derived and hue underlying components shows that misallocation depends exclusively on incorrect identification of the affected component. Simulations, using seven imperfect rotations, confirmed all predictions from the vector interpretation concerning the presence, direction, and size of misallocated variance. Contrary to principal component analysis (PCA), Mocks's topographic component model (TCM) is not subject to rotation problems. These two methods were compared over 100 simulations in which the components had constant waveforms and topographies across participants. The group effect was always detected, but only PCA and not TCM showed significance on other components, except when their random weights happened to differ between groups.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 606
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   CEREBRAL SOURCE LOCALIZATION PARADIGMS - SPATIOTEMPORAL SOURCE MODELING [J].
ACHIM, A .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1995, 27 (03) :256-287
[2]  
ACHIM A, IN PRESS ELECTROENCE, V103
[3]   A MULTICHANNEL, MODEL-FREE METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL AMPLITUDES AND ITS COMPARISON WITH DIPOLE SOURCE LOCALIZATION [J].
CARDENAS, VA ;
YINGLING, CD ;
JEWETT, D ;
FEIN, G .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 19 (2-3) :88-98
[4]   ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING VIA AN N-WAY GENERALIZATION OF ECKART-YOUNG DECOMPOSITION [J].
CARROLL, JD ;
CHANG, JJ .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1970, 35 (03) :283-&
[5]   EP COMPONENT IDENTIFICATION AND MEASUREMENT BY PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS-ANALYSIS [J].
CHAPMAN, RM ;
MCCRARY, JW .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1995, 27 (03) :288-310
[6]  
Donchin E., 1978, P 4 INT C EVENT RELA, P555
[7]  
FIELD A S, 1991, Brain Topography, V3, P407, DOI 10.1007/BF01129000
[8]  
Glaser E., 1976, PRINCIPLES NEUROBIOL
[9]  
Harshman R.A., 1984, RES METHODS MULTIMOD, P122
[10]  
Harshman R.A., 1984, RES METHODS MULTIMOD, P216