Microbat paraphyly and the convergent evolution of a key innovation in Old World rhinolophoid microbats

被引:157
作者
Teeling, EC
Madsen, O
Van den Bussche, RA
de Jong, WW
Stanhope, MJ [1 ]
Springer, MS
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Biol, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Univ Nijmegen, Dept Biochem, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Zool, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[5] Oklahoma State Univ, Oklahoma Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[6] Inst Biodivers & Ecosyst Dynam, NL-1090 GT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] GlaxoSmithKline, Bioinformat, Collegeville, PA 19426 USA
关键词
bats; Chiroptera; echolocation; Mammalia; phylogeny;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.022477199
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Molecular phylogenies challenge the view that bats belong to the superordinal group Archonta, which also includes primates, tree shrews, and flying lemurs. Some molecular studies also challenge microbat monophyly and instead support an alliance between megabats and representative rhinolophoid microbats from the families Rhinolophiclae (horseshoe bats, Old World leaf-nosed bats) and Megadermatidae (false vampire bats), Another molecular study ostensibly contradicts these results and supports traditional microbat monophyly, inclusive of representative rhinolophoids from the family Nycteridae (slit-faced bats). Resolution of the microbat paraphyly/monophyly issue is essential for reconstructing the temporal sequence and deployment of morphological character state changes associated with flight and echolocation in bats. If microbats are paraphyletic, then laryngeal echolocation either evolved more than once in different microbats or was lost in megabats after evolving in the ancestor of all living bats. To examine these issues, we used a 7.1-kb nuclear data set for nine outgroups and twenty bats, including representatives of all rhinolophold families. Phylogenetic analyses and statistical tests rejected both Archonta and microbat monophyly. Instead, bats are in the superorder Laurasiatheria and microbats are paraphyletic. Further, the superfamily Rhinolophoidea is polyphyletic. The rhinolophoid families Rhinolophiclae and Megadermatidae belong to the suborder Yinpterochiroptera along with rhinopomatids and megabats. The rhinolophoid family Nycteridae belongs to the suborder Yangochiroptera along with vespertilionoids, noctilionoids, and emballonuroids. These results resolve the apparent conflict between previous molecular studies that sampled different rhinolophoid families. An important implication of rhinolophold polyphyly is independent evolution of key anatomical innovations associated with the nasal-emission of echolocation pulses.
引用
收藏
页码:1431 / 1436
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] DNA synapomorphies for a variety of taxonomic levels from a cosmid library from the new world bat Macrotus waterhousii
    Baker, RJ
    Longmire, JL
    Maltbie, M
    Hamilton, MJ
    Van den Bussche, RA
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1997, 46 (04) : 579 - 589
  • [2] BEARD KC, 1993, MAMMAL PHYLOGENY : PLACENTALS, P129
  • [3] CABOT EL, 1989, COMPUT APPL BIOSCI, V5, P233
  • [4] Cronin J.E., 1980, P293
  • [5] DEQUEIROZ A, 1993, SYST BIOL, V42, P368
  • [6] Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining
    Farris, JS
    Albert, VA
    Kallersjo, M
    Lipscomb, D
    Kluge, AG
    [J]. CLADISTICS, 1996, 12 (02) : 99 - 124
  • [7] Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics
    Goldman, N
    Anderson, JP
    Rodrigo, AG
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2000, 49 (04) : 652 - 670
  • [8] Gregory W.K., 1910, B AM MUS NAT HIST, V37, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13364-013-0165-6
  • [9] Hillis David M., 1996, P515
  • [10] Huelsenbeck John P., 1996, P19