The Growth Effects of National Patent Policies

被引:15
作者
Dinopoulos, Elias [1 ]
Kottaridi, Constantina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Econ, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Peloponnese, Sch Management & Econ, Dept Econ, Tripolis 22100, Greece
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9396.2008.00742.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We construct a two-country (innovative North and imitating South) model of product-cycle trade, fully endogenous Schumpeterian growth, and national patent policies. A move towards harmonization based on stronger Southern intellectual property rights (IPR) protection accelerates the long-run global rates of innovation and growth, reduces the North-South wage gap, and has an ambiguous effect on the rate of international technology transfer. Patent harmonization constitutes a suboptimal global-growth policy. However, if the global economy is governed by a common patent policy regime, then stronger global IPR protection: (a) increases the rates of global innovation and growth; (b) accelerates the rate of international technology transfer; and (c) has no impact on the North-South wage gap.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 515
页数:17
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
DINOPOULOS E, 2007, GROWTH EFFECTS UNPUB
[2]  
DINOPOULOS E, 2007, N S TRADE EC G UNPUB
[3]  
Dinopoulos E., 2008, GLOBALIZATION TRADE
[4]  
Dinopoulos E, 2007, ELGAR ORIG REF, P688
[5]   Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment [J].
Glass, AJ ;
Saggi, K .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 56 (02) :387-410
[6]   The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth [J].
Gould, DM ;
Gruben, WC .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1996, 48 (02) :323-350
[7]   International protection of intellectual property [J].
Grossman, GA ;
Lai, ELC .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 94 (05) :1635-1653
[8]  
Grossman GM., 1991, Innovation and growth in the global economy
[9]   INNOVATION, IMITATION, AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY-RIGHTS [J].
HELPMAN, E .
ECONOMETRICA, 1993, 61 (06) :1247-1280
[10]   TIME-SERIES TESTS OF ENDOGENOUS GROWTH-MODELS [J].
JONES, CI .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (02) :495-525