Potassium phosphonate alters the defence response of Xanthorrhoea australis following infection by Phytophthora cinnamomi

被引:21
作者
Daniel, R
Wilson, BA
Cahill, DM
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Agr Food & Nat Resources, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Sch Ecol & Environm, Waurn Ponds, Vic 3217, Australia
关键词
dieback; induced resistance; phosphite;
D O I
10.1071/AP05074
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Potassium phosphonate (phosphite) is widely used in the management of Phytophthora diseases in agriculture, horticulture and natural environments. The Austral grass tree, Xanthorrhoea australis, a keystone species in the dry sclerophyll forests of southern Australia, is susceptible to Phytophthora cinnamomi, but is protected by applications of phosphite. We examined the effect of phosphite application on the infection of X. australis seedlings and cell suspension cultures by zoospores of P. cinnamomi. Phosphite induced more intense cellular responses to pathogen challenge and suppressed pathogen ingress in both seedlings and cell cultures. In untreated X. australis seedlings, hyphal growth was initially intercellular, became intracellular 24 h after inoculation, and by 48 h had progressed into the vascular tissue. In phosphite-treated seedlings, growth of P. cinnamomi remained intercellular and was limited to the cortex, even at 72 h after inoculation. The cell membrane retracted from the cell wall and phenolic compounds and electron dense substances were deposited around the wall of infected and neighbouring cells. Suspension cells were infected within 6 h of inoculation. Within 24 h of inoculation, untreated cells were fully colonised, had collapsed cytoplasm and died. The protoplast of phosphite-treated suspension cells collapsed within 12 h of inoculation, and phenolic material accumulated in adjacent, uninfected cells. No anatomical response to phosphite treatment was observed before infection of plant tissues, suggesting that the phosphite-associated host defence response is induced following pathogen challenge. Anatomical changes provide evidence that phosphite stimulates the host defence system to respond more effectively to pathogen invasion.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 548
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Potassium phosphonate controls root rot of Xanthorrhoea australis and X-minor caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi [J].
Ali, Z ;
Guest, DL .
AUSTRALASIAN PLANT PATHOLOGY, 1998, 27 (01) :40-44
[2]   Induction of systemic resistance to Pythium damping-off in cucumber plants by benzothiadiazole:: ultrastructure and cytochemistry of the host response [J].
Benhamou, N ;
Bélanger, RR .
PLANT JOURNAL, 1998, 14 (01) :13-21
[3]   SOME CONDITIONS GOVERNING ZOOSPORE PRODUCTION IN AXENIC CULTURES OF PHYTOPHTHORA-CINNAMOMI RANDS [J].
BYRT, P ;
GRANT, BR .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1979, 27 (02) :103-115
[4]   A COMPARISON OF CHANGES IN PHENYLALANINE AMMONIA-LYASE ACTIVITY, LIGNIN AND PHENOLIC SYNTHESIS IN THE ROOTS FO EUCALYPTUS-CALOPHYLLA (FIELD RESISTANT) AND E-MARGINATA (SUSCEPTIBLE) WHEN INFECTED WITH PHYTOPHTHORA-CINNAMOMI [J].
CAHILL, DM ;
MCCOMB, JA .
PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, 1992, 40 (05) :315-332
[5]  
CAHILL DM, 1986, THESIS U MELBOURNE V
[6]   SYSTEMIC TRANSPORT OF TRITIATED PHOSPHONATE IN TOMATO PLANTLETS (LYCOPERSICON-ESCULENTUM MILL) [J].
DARCYLAMETA, A ;
BOMPEIX, G .
PESTICIDE SCIENCE, 1991, 32 (01) :7-14
[7]   THE COMPLEX ACTION OF PHOSPHONATES AS ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS [J].
GUEST, D ;
GRANT, B .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS OF THE CAMBRIDGE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, 1991, 66 (02) :159-187
[8]   The future of phosphite as a fungicide to control the soilborne plant pathogen Phytophthora cinnamomi in natural ecosystems [J].
Hardy, GES ;
Barrett, S ;
Shearer, BL .
AUSTRALASIAN PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2001, 30 (02) :133-139
[9]   AN ULTRASTRUCTURAL-STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF METALAXYL ON PHYTOPHTHORA-CAPSICI INFECTED STEMS OF CAPSICUM-ANNUUM [J].
HWANG, BK ;
EBRAHIMNESBAT, F ;
IBENTHAL, WD ;
HEITEFUSS, R .
PESTICIDE SCIENCE, 1990, 29 (02) :151-162
[10]   PHYTOPHTHORA IN AUSTRALIA [J].
IRWIN, JAG ;
CAHILL, DM ;
DRENTH, A .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1995, 46 (07) :1311-1337