Enhancement and evaluation of the AIRPACT ozone and PM2.5 forecast system for the Pacific Northwest

被引:51
作者
Chen, Jack [1 ]
Vaughan, Joe [1 ]
Avise, Jeremy [1 ]
O'Neill, Susan [2 ]
Lamb, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Lab Atmospher Res, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Resources Conservat Serv, USDA, Washington, DC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2007JD009554
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The Air Indicator Report for Public Access and Community Tracking (AIRPACT) real-time numerical air quality forecast system operates daily in the Pacific Northwest region to predict hourly ozone, PM2.5 and related precursor and pollutant species. In an update to the existing AIRPACT forecast system, the MM5/SMOKE/CMAQ Eulerian modeling system replaces the MM5/CALMET/CALGRID model framework. The new system, AIRPACT-3, has a larger domain that encompasses Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and bordering areas. The system includes a highly dynamic emission processing subsystem which incorporates anthropogenic and biogenic emissions, as well as real-time wildfire emission estimates, and a dynamic dairy ammonia emissions module. As an initial evaluation of the system, forecast results were compared against measurement data for the August-November 2004 period. Analyses showed that the system is skillful in predicting episodic ozone conditions (8-h daily maxima) above 50 ppbv, but systematically over-predicts levels less than 40 ppbv. For fine particulate matter, PM2.5, the system captures the concentration differences between urban and rural regions, and captures qualitatively the speciated distribution of fine PM2.5 component concentrations. A separate emission sensitivity study shows the system can adequately simulate the PM pollution impacts from fire events; however, the new dairy ammonia emission module has lesser impact on the overall PM2.5 forecast performance.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Testing CMAQ chemistry sensitivities in base case and emissions control runs at SEARCH and SOS99 surface sites in the southeastern US [J].
Arnold, J. R. ;
Dennis, Robin L. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (26) :5027-5040
[2]   A comparison of the performance of four air quality models for the Southern Oxidants Study episode in July 1999 [J].
Bailey, E. M. ;
Gautney, L. L. ;
Kelsoe, J. J. ;
Jacobs, M. E. ;
Mao, Q. ;
Condrey, J. W. ;
Pun, B. ;
Wu, S. -Y. ;
Seigneur, C. ;
Douglas, S. ;
Haney, J. ;
Kumar, N. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2007, 112 (D5)
[3]   Improving ozone modeling in regions of complex terrain using observational nudging in a prognostic meteorological model [J].
Barna, M ;
Lamb, B .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 34 (28) :4889-4906
[4]   Insights from the BRAVO study on nesting global models to specify boundary conditions in regional air quality modeling simulations [J].
Barna, Michael G. ;
Knipping, Eladio M. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (574-582) :S574-S582
[5]   Models-3 community multiscale air quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component - 1. Model description [J].
Binkowski, FS ;
Roselle, SJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D6)
[6]   PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models [J].
Boylan, James W. ;
Russell, Armistead G. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (26) :4946-4959
[7]   Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system [J].
Byun, Daewon ;
Schere, Kenneth L. .
APPLIED MECHANICS REVIEWS, 2006, 59 (1-6) :51-77
[8]  
*CAR ENV PROGR, 2005, SPARS MATR OP KERN E
[9]  
CARTER WPL, 2000, 92329 CAL AIR RES BO, P95
[10]   An operational evaluation of the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model [J].
Eder, Brian ;
Kang, Daiwen ;
Mathur, Rohit ;
Yu, Shaocai ;
Schere, Ken .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (26) :4894-4905