Surface properties of CeO2 from first principles -: art. no. 075401

被引:317
作者
Skorodumova, NV [1 ]
Baudin, M [1 ]
Hermansson, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Angstrom Lab, SE-75121 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevB.69.075401
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The surface energies and electronic structure of (111), (110), and (100) surfaces of CeO2 have been studied using the first-principles projector augmented-wave method within the local density approximation (LDA) and generalized gradient approximation (GGA) and are compared with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at 10 K. Slabs of the same thicknesses were used for the two methods (lamellar three-dimensional boxes in the case of density functional theory and two-dimensional isolated slabs in the MD simulations). The polar (100) surface of CeO2 was modeled as an oxygen-terminated surface with half of the oxygen atoms moved from one surface to the other to fulfill the stoichiometric formula. Among a number of different possible terminations, the checkerboard termination was found to be the most stable. Out of all three low-index surfaces, the (111) surface was found to be the most stable, in agreement with experiment and previous calculations. Our calculated surface energy is 1.0 J/m(2) (LDA) and 0.7 J/m(2) (GGA). Both values are lower than most calculated surface energies for this surface in the literature, including our present MD results (1.4 J/m(2)). For (110) our surface energies (LDA, GGA, and MD) are 40%-60% higher than for (111). The structural relaxation is considerably larger for (110) than for (111) and shows excellent agreement between LDA, GGA, and MD. Also the electronic density of states shows larger differences between surface and bulk for the (110) surface than for (111), with, for example, a decrease of the band gap between the valence band (essentially O 2p) and the empty Ce 4f band in the (110) surface region compared to the bulk.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   A molecular dynamics study of MgO(111) slabs [J].
Baudin, M ;
Wojcik, M ;
Hermansson, K .
SURFACE SCIENCE, 1997, 375 (2-3) :374-384
[2]   Dynamics, structure and energetics of the (111), (011) and (001) surfaces of ceria [J].
Baudin, M ;
Wójcik, M ;
Hermansson, K .
SURFACE SCIENCE, 2000, 468 (1-3) :51-61
[3]   PROJECTOR AUGMENTED-WAVE METHOD [J].
BLOCHL, PE .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1994, 50 (24) :17953-17979
[4]   COMPUTER MODELING OF SURFACES AND DEFECTS ON CERIUM DIOXIDE [J].
CONESA, JC .
SURFACE SCIENCE, 1995, 339 (03) :337-352
[5]   Alternative energy technologies [J].
Dresselhaus, MS ;
Thomas, IL .
NATURE, 2001, 414 (6861) :332-337
[6]  
Ewald PP, 1921, ANN PHYS-BERLIN, V64, P253
[7]  
Eyring L., 1979, HDB PHYSICS CHEM RAR, V3
[8]   Comparison of the bulk and surface properties of ceria and zirconia by ab initio investigations [J].
Gennard, S ;
Corà, F ;
Catlow, CRA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 1999, 103 (46) :10158-10170
[9]  
GENNARD S, 1999, J PHYS B ATOM MOL PH, V101, P1750
[10]   Surface structure determination of CeO2(001) by angle-resolved mass spectroscopy of recoiled ions [J].
Herman, GS .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1999, 59 (23) :14899-14902