Latex-specific IgE, skin testing, and lymphocyte transformation to latex in latex allergy

被引:63
作者
Ebo, DG [1 ]
Stevens, WJ [1 ]
Bridts, CH [1 ]
DeClerck, LS [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ANTWERP,DEPT IMMUNOL ALLERGOL & RHEUMATOL,B-2610 ANTWERP,BELGIUM
关键词
IgE; latex; lymphocyte proliferation; skin test;
D O I
10.1016/S0091-6749(97)70165-9
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: This study was designed to determine the discriminative value of latex-specific IgE tests, latex skin tests, and lymphocyte transformation tests (LTTs) to latex in 38 patients with latex allergy (12 nonatopic and 26 atopic) and 44 control subjects (24 nonatopic and 20 atopic). We also evaluated the recommended positive cutoff (i.e., 0.35 kU/L) of both in vitro latex-IgE tests. Methods: Latex-specific IgE levels were determined by the Immuno-CAP (Upjohn-Pharmacia) and the ALaSTAT-RIA (Diagnostic Products Corp.) assays, Skin tests and LTTs were performed with a nonammoniated latex extract (DPC). Sensitivities and specificities were defined according to the 95th percentile value of nonatopic control subjects, For the in vitro IgE tests, sensitivity and specificity were also calculated by using the proposed positive threshold of 0.35 kU/L. Sensitivities and specificities of both cutoffs were compared. Results: Compared with a clinical history of latex allergy and according to the 95th percentile value of nonatopic control subjects (0.44 kU/L), latex-specific IgE determined by the Immuno-CAP assay achieved a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 86%. For the ALaSTAT-RIA assay, with 0.54 kU/L as the 95th percentile threshold value in nonatopic control subjects, sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 83%. According to the threshold value of 0.35 kU/L, a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 83% for the Immuno-CAP assay and a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 33% for the ALaSTAT-RIA assay were observed. The latex skin test reached a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 100%. The LTT to latex showed a sensitivity of 39% and a specificity of 95%. No relation between symptoms and latex-specific IgE tests, latex skin tests, or LTTs nas found. Conclusions: Our results confirm that latex skin tests and latex-specific IgE assessments are sensitive and specific methods for establishing the diagnosis of latex allergy, although the specificity of the ALaSTAT-RIA assay was very low when interpreted according to the threshold of 0.35 kU/L. The LTT to nonammoniated latex is too insensitive for diagnosis of allergy to latex This reemphasizes that in order to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic procedures, one should always include an appropriate control group.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 623
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   SAFETY OF LATEX PRICK SKIN TESTING IN ALLERGIC PATIENTS [J].
BONNEKOH, B ;
MERK, HF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (19) :2603-2603
[2]   ALLERGIC REACTIONS TO LATEX AMONG HEALTH-CARE WORKERS [J].
BUBAK, ME ;
REED, CE ;
FRANSWAY, AF ;
YUNGINGER, JW ;
JONES, RT ;
CARLSON, CA ;
HUNT, LW .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1992, 67 (11) :1075-1079
[3]   IMMEDIATE REACTIONS TO RUBBER PRODUCTS [J].
FUCHS, T ;
WAHL, R .
ALLERGY PROCEEDINGS, 1992, 13 (02) :61-66
[4]  
Grimm A., 1927, KLIN WOCHENSCHR, V6, P1479, DOI 10.1007/BF017185344.
[5]  
HOLZMAN RS, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P635
[6]   THE DIAGNOSIS OF NATURAL-RUBBER LATEX ALLERGY [J].
KELLY, KJ ;
KURUP, VP ;
REIJULA, KE ;
FINK, JN .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1994, 93 (05) :813-816
[7]   SKIN AND SEROLOGIC TESTING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF LATEX ALLERGY [J].
KELLY, KJ ;
KURUP, V ;
ZACHARISEN, M ;
RESNICK, A ;
FINK, JN .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1993, 91 (06) :1140-1145
[8]   IMMUNOGLOBULIN-E REACTIVITY TO LATEX ANTIGENS IN THE SERA OF PATIENTS FROM FINLAND AND THE UNITED-STATES [J].
KURUP, VP ;
KELLY, KJ ;
TURJANMAA, K ;
ALENIUS, H ;
REUNALA, T ;
PALOSUO, T ;
FINK, JN .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1993, 91 (06) :1128-1134
[9]   ALLERGY TO LATEX [J].
LEVY, DA ;
CHARPIN, D ;
PECQUET, C ;
LEYNADIER, F ;
VERVLOET, D .
ALLERGY, 1992, 47 (06) :579-587
[10]  
Magera B., 1996, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, V97, P322, DOI 10.1016/S0091-6749(96)80777-9