Recall and recognition in mild hypoxia:: using covariance structural modeling to test competing theories of explicit memory

被引:71
作者
Quamme, JR [1 ]
Yonelinas, AP
Widaman, KF
Kroll, NEA
Sauvé, MJ
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Ctr Neurosci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Davis Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
memory; amnesia; modeling; recollection; familiarity;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.09.008
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
To test theories of explicit memory in amnesia, we examined the effect of hypoxia on memory performance in a group of 56 survivors of sudden cardiac arrest. Structural equation modeling revealed that a single-factor explanation of recall and recognition was insufficient to account for performance, thus contradicting single-process models of explicit memory. A dual-process model of recall in which two processes (e.g., declarative memory and controlled search) contribute to recall performance, whereas only one process (e.g., declarative memory) underlies recognition performance, also failed to explain the results adequately. In contrast, a dual-process model of recognition provided an acceptable account of the data. In this model, two processes-recollection and familiarity-underlie recognition memory, whereas only the recollection process contributes to free recall. The best-fitting model was one in which hypoxia and aging led to deficits in recollection, but left familiarity unaffected. Moreover, a controlled search process was correlated with recollection, but was not associated with familiarity or the severity of hypoxia. The results support models of explicit memory in which recollection depends on the hippocampus and frontal lobes, whereas familiarity-based recognition relies on other brain regions. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 691
页数:20
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Aggleton JP, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P425
[2]   Amnesia and recognition memory: A re-analysis of psychometric data [J].
Aggleton, JP ;
Shaw, C .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1996, 34 (01) :51-62
[3]   FACTOR-ANALYSIS AND AIC [J].
AKAIKE, H .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1987, 52 (03) :317-332
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, TESTING STRUCTURAL E, DOI DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005
[5]  
[Anonymous], NEUROPSYCHOLOGY MEMO
[6]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1037/0894-4105.9.3.304
[7]  
Atkinson R.C., 1974, Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: I. Learning, P243
[8]  
Bachevalier J, 1996, HIPPOCAMPUS, V6, P553, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1996)6:5<553::AID-HIPO8>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-J
[10]   Preserved recognition in a case of developmental amnesia: Implications for the acquisition of semantic memory? [J].
Baddeley, AD ;
Vargha-Khadem, F ;
Mishkin, M .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (03) :357-369