Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative Polling and public opinion

被引：295

作者：

Fishkin, JS ^{[1
]}

Luskin, RC

机构：

[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Commun, Stanford, CA 94305 USA

[2] Univ Texas, Dept Govt, Austin, TX 78712 USA

来源：

ACTA POLITICA | 2005年 / 40卷 / 03期

关键词：

Deliberative Polling; deliberative democracy; political equality; informed; opinion;

D O I：

10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121

中图分类号：

D0 [政治学、政治理论];

学科分类号：

0302 ; 030201 ;

摘要：

The values of deliberation and political equality have proven hard to achieve simultaneously. Deliberative Polling, which embodies both, provides a useful window on deliberative democracy. The results, responding to 'defeatist,' 'extenuationist,' and 'alarmist' critiques, show that ordinary people can deliberate, that they benefit from doing so, and that the process neither biases nor polarizes their opinions.

引用

页码：284 / 298

页数：15

共 39 条

[1] [Anonymous], 1963, EXPT QUASIEXPERIMENT
[2] [Anonymous], 1999, ANN M MIDWEST
[3] [Anonymous], 1939, PUBLIC OPINION DEMOC
[4] [Anonymous], 2004, POLITICAL DISAGREEME
[5] STUDIES OF INDEPENDENCE AND CONFORMITY .1. A MINORITY OF ONE AGAINST A UNANIMOUS MAJORITY
ASCH, SE
[J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1956, 70 (09): : 1 - 70
[6] Cohen J., 1997, Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, P67
[7] Converse PE, 1964, IDEOLOGY DISCONTENT
[8] DAHL R, 2002, DEMOCRATIC AM CONSTI
[9] Dahl R.A., 1961, WHO GOVERNS
[10] FISHKIN J, 1992, DIALOGUE JUSTICE

← 1 2 3 4 →