Evaluation of DOCK 6 as a pose generation and database enrichment tool

被引:123
作者
Brozell, Scott R. [2 ,3 ]
Mukherjee, Sudipto [1 ]
Balius, Trent E. [1 ]
Roe, Daniel R. [2 ,3 ]
Case, David A. [2 ,3 ]
Rizzo, Robert C. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Appl Math & Stat, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, BioMaPS Inst, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Chem & Chem Biol, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[4] SUNY Stony Brook, Inst Chem Biol & Drug Discovery, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Pose identification; Pose rescoring; Docking; Virtual screening; Enrichment; ROC curves; Scoring; Sampling; Rmsd; Symmetry; AUTOMATED MOLECULAR DOCKING; FREE-ENERGIES; MM-PBSA; VALIDATION; ALGORITHMS; STRATEGIES; SOLVATION; SEARCH; OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-012-9565-y
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In conjunction with the recent American Chemical Society symposium titled "Docking and Scoring: A Review of Docking Programs" the performance of the DOCK6 program was evaluated through (1) pose reproduction and (2) database enrichment calculations on a common set of organizer-specified systems and datasets (ASTEX, DUD, WOMBAT). Representative baseline grid score results averaged over five docking runs yield a relatively high pose identification success rate of 72.5 % (symmetry corrected rmsd) and sampling rate of 91.9 % for the multi site ASTEX set (N = 147) using organizer-supplied structures. Numerous additional docking experiments showed that ligand starting conditions, symmetry, multiple binding sites, clustering, and receptor preparation protocols all affect success. Encouragingly, in some cases, use of more sophisticated scoring and sampling methods yielded results which were comparable (Amber score ligand movable protocol) or exceeded (LMOD score) analogous baseline grid-score results. The analysis highlights the potential benefit and challenges associated with including receptor flexibility and indicates that different scoring functions have system dependent strengths and weaknesses. Enrichment studies with the DUD database prepared using the SB2010 preparation protocol and native ligand pairings yielded individual area under the curve (AUC) values derived from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis ranging from 0.29 (bad enrichment) to 0.96 (good enrichment) with an average value of 0.60 (27/38 have AUC a parts per thousand yen 0.5). Strong early enrichment was also observed in the critically important 1.0-2.0 % region. Somewhat surprisingly, an alternative receptor preparation protocol yielded comparable results. As expected, semi-random pairings yielded poorer enrichments, in particular, for unrelated receptors. Overall, the breadth and number of experiments performed provide a useful snapshot of current capabilities of DOCK6 as well as starting points to guide future development efforts to further improve sampling and scoring.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 773
页数:25
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ACS S SER
  • [2] Implementation and Evaluation of a Docking-Rescoring Method Using Molecular Footprint Comparisons
    Balius, Trent E.
    Mukherjee, Sudipto
    Rizzo, Robert C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 32 (10) : 2273 - 2289
  • [3] Origins of resistance conferred by the R292K neuraminidase mutation via molecular dynamics and free energy calculations
    Chachra, Ricky
    Rizzo, Robert C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2008, 4 (09) : 1526 - 1540
  • [4] Comparison of Several Molecular Docking Programs: Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Accuracy
    Cross, Jason B.
    Thompson, David C.
    Rai, Brajesh K.
    Baber, J. Christian
    Fan, Kristi Yi
    Hu, Yongbo
    Humblet, Christine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2009, 49 (06) : 1455 - 1474
  • [5] STRUCTURE-BASED DESIGN OF NONPEPTIDE INHIBITORS SPECIFIC FOR THE HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS-1 PROTEASE
    DESJARLAIS, RL
    SEIBEL, GL
    KUNTZ, ID
    FURTH, PS
    ALVAREZ, JC
    DEMONTELLANO, PRO
    DECAMP, DL
    BABE, LM
    CRAIK, CS
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1990, 87 (17) : 6644 - 6648
  • [6] Ewing TJA, 1997, J COMPUT CHEM, V18, P1175, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19970715)18:9<1175::AID-JCC6>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-O
  • [8] DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases
    Ewing, TJA
    Makino, S
    Skillman, AG
    Kuntz, ID
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2001, 15 (05) : 411 - 428
  • [9] ITERATIVE PARTIAL EQUALIZATION OF ORBITAL ELECTRONEGATIVITY - A RAPID ACCESS TO ATOMIC CHARGES
    GASTEIGER, J
    MARSILI, M
    [J]. TETRAHEDRON, 1980, 36 (22) : 3219 - 3228
  • [10] Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection?
    Good, Andrew C.
    Oprea, Tudor I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2008, 22 (3-4) : 169 - 178