Accuracy of clinical assessment of paravaginal defects in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse

被引:38
作者
Barber, MD [1 ]
Cundiff, GW [1 ]
Weidner, AC [1 ]
Coates, KW [1 ]
Bump, RC [1 ]
Addison, WA [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Specialties, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
paravaginal defect; pelvic organ prolapse; cystocele; pelvic examination;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70440-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of clinical assessment of paravaginal defects in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of all women undergoing surgery for anterior vaginal wall prolapse during the years of 1994 to 1996 identified operative notes that described the surgical assessment of paravaginal support. These surgical findings were compared with the preoperative clinical assessment. Clinical parameters that predicted poor correlation were identified. Statistical analysis used the chi(2) test. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen patients had surgery for anterior vaginal prolapse. Seventy had documentation of an intraoperative paravaginal support evaluation. Of these. 44 patients had vaginal procedures, and 26 had abdominal procedures. All patients had at least stage 2 prolapse before surgery, and all were noted to have excellent pelvic support 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. The prevalence of paravaginal defects at surgery was 47% on the right and 41% on the left. The sensitivity and negative predictive value for the clinical assessment for paravaginal defects were good on both the right and Left sides, whereas the specificity and positive predictive values were poor. Stage of prolapse, previous hysterectomy, or previous anterior colporrhaphy did not significantly affect the accuracy of the clinical examination in predicting fascial defects. However, previous retropubic urethropexy did significantly decrease the accuracy of the clinical examination in predicting right paravaginal defects (P < .01) but not left. CONCLUSION: Although preoperative clinical assessment for paravaginal defects is useful, it does not substitute for careful intraoperative evaluation for endopelvic fascial defects.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 90
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Periurethral and paravaginal anatomy: An endovaginal magnetic resonance imaging study [J].
Aronson, MP ;
Bates, SM ;
Jacoby, AF ;
Chelmow, D ;
Sant, GR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (06) :1702-1710
[2]  
Baden WB, 1992, SURG REPAIR VAGINAL, P183
[3]   The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction [J].
Bump, RC ;
Mattiasson, A ;
Bo, K ;
Brubaker, LP ;
DeLancey, JOL ;
Klarskov, P ;
Shull, BL ;
Smith, ARB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) :10-17
[4]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF DEFECTS IN DELANCEYS VAGINAL SUPPORT LEVEL-I, LEVEL-II, AND LEVEL-III [J].
HUDDLESTON, HT ;
DUNNIHOO, DR ;
HUDDLESTON, PM ;
MEYERS, PC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 172 (06) :1778-1784
[5]  
Kelly H.A., 1913, Urol. Cutan. Rev., V17, P291
[6]   NEW LOOK AT PELVIC RELAXATION [J].
RICHARDSON, AC ;
LYON, JB ;
WILLIAMS, NL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1976, 126 (05) :568-573
[7]   SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT OF PROLAPSE OF THE ANTERIOR VAGINAL SEGMENT - AN ANALYSIS OF SUPPORT DEFECTS, OPERATIVE MORBIDITY, AND ANATOMIC OUTCOME [J].
SHULL, BL ;
BENN, SJ ;
KUEHL, TJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 171 (06) :1429-1439
[8]   CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF WOMEN WITH PELVIC SUPPORT DEFECTS [J].
SHULL, BL .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 36 (04) :939-951
[9]  
SHULL BL, 1995, J PELVIC SURG, V1, P43
[10]  
White GR, 1909, J AMER MED ASSOC, V53, P1707