Efficacy of omeprazole versus ranitidine for symptomatic treatment of poorly responsive acid reflux disease - a prospective, controlled trial

被引:13
作者
Maton, PN
Orlando, R
Joelsson, B
机构
[1] Digest Dis Res Inst, Oklahoma City, OK 73104 USA
[2] Tulane Sch Med, Dept Med, GI Sect, New Orleans, LA USA
[3] Astra Merck Inc, Wayne, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00527.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: H-2-receptor antagonists are widely used in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and are frequently continued when symptoms persist. Aim: To compare the efficacy of omeprazole 20 mg once daily with that of ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in relieving GERD symptoms, in patients who remained symptomatic following a 6-week course of ranitidine therapy. Methods: Patients with heartburn on at least 4 days/week but who did not have endoscopy to assess oesophageal mucosa could participate. This two-phase, prospective trial included a 6-week open-label phase (phase I), followed by an 8-week double-blind phase (phase II). Patients still symptomatic following treatment with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (phase I) were randomized to double-blind treatment (phase II) with either omeprazole 20 mg once daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients with heartburn resolution during weeks 4 and 8 of phase II. Results: Of the 533 patients with GERD who received ranitidine in phase I, 348 patients (65%) were still symptomatic. A total of 317 patients (59%) were randomized to double-blind treatment (phase II). At week 8, a significantly (P < 0.0004) greater proportion of omeprazole-treated patients (70%) experienced no more than mild heartburn compared with ranitidine-treated patients (49%). Complete resolution of heartburn also occurred in a significantly (P < 0.00001) greater proportion of omeprazole-treated patients (46% vs. 16% of the ranitidine group at week 8). Conclusions: After 6 weeks of ranitidine treatment, the majority of patients with GERD were still experiencing moderate to severe heartburn. Omeprazole was significantly more effective than ranitidine in resolving heartburn in this group of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 826
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BR J CLIN RES
[2]   ROLE OF GASTRIC-ACID SUPPRESSION IN THE TREATMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE [J].
BELL, NJV ;
HUNT, RH .
GUT, 1992, 33 (01) :118-124
[3]   COST AND QUALITY EFFECTS OF TREATING EROSIVE ESOPHAGITIS - A REEVALUATION [J].
BLOOM, BS .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1995, 8 (02) :139-146
[4]  
De Simone M, 1998, PANMINERVA MED, V40, P139
[5]   GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE [J].
DEVAULT, KR ;
CASTELL, DO .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 155 (20) :2165-2173
[6]   CURRENT DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE [J].
DEVAULT, KR ;
CASTELL, DO .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1994, 69 (09) :867-876
[7]  
FESTEN H, 1996, EUROPEAN J GASTROENT, V8, pA34
[8]  
GREEN JRB, 1993, EUR J CLIN RES, V4, P29
[9]   COST AND QUALITY EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS FOR PERSISTENT GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE [J].
HILLMAN, AL ;
BLOOM, BS ;
FENDRICK, AM ;
SCHWARTZ, JS .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 152 (07) :1467-1472
[10]   APPROPRIATE ACID SUPPRESSION IN THE TREATMENT OF ACID-RELATED CONDITIONS [J].
HOWDEN, CW .
PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1994, 63 (01) :123-134