Plant-soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review

被引:770
作者
Kulmatiski, Andrew [1 ]
Beard, Karen H. [1 ]
Stevens, John R. [2 ]
Cobbold, Stephanie M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Wildland Resources & Ecol, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[3] Utah State Univ, Dept Biol, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[4] Utah State Univ, Ctr Ecol, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
Bayes model; hierarchical dependence; invasion; meta-analysis; non-native; plant diversity; sampling dependence; soil community; soil transplant; succession;
D O I
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01209.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Plants can change soil biology, chemistry and structure in ways that alter subsequent Plants can change soil biology plant growth. This process, referred to as plant-soil feedback (PSF), has been suggested to provide mechanisms for plant diversity, succession and invasion. Here we use three meta-analytical models: a mixed model and two Bayes models, one correcting for sampling dependence and one correcting for sampling and hierarchical dependence (delta-splitting model) to test these hypotheses. All three models showed that PSFs have medium to large negative effects on plant growth, and especially grass growth, the life form for which we had the most data. This supports the hypothesis that PSFs, through negative frequency dependence, maintain plant diversity, especially in grasslands. PSFs were also large and negative for annuals and natives, but the delta-splitting model indicated that more studies are needed for these results to be conclusive. Our results support the hypotheses that PSFs encourage successional replacements and plant invasions. Most studies were performed using monocultures of grassland species in greenhouse conditions. Future research should examine PSFs in plant communities, non-grassland systems and field conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:980 / 992
页数:13
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Enemy release? An experiment with congeneric plant pairs and diverse above- and belowground enemies [J].
Agrawal, AA ;
Kotanen, PM ;
Mitchell, CE ;
Power, AG ;
Godsoe, W ;
Klironomos, J .
ECOLOGY, 2005, 86 (11) :2979-2989
[2]  
[Anonymous], HDB RES SYNTHESIS
[3]  
Baack EJ, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, P2736, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2736:EFLTDO]2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   Soil microbial community associated with an invasive grass differentially impacts native plant performance [J].
Batten, Katharine M. ;
Scow, Kate M. ;
Espeland, Erin K. .
MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 55 (02) :220-228
[6]   Invasiveness of Ammophila arenaria:: Release from soil-borne pathogens? [J].
Beckstead, J ;
Parker, IM .
ECOLOGY, 2003, 84 (11) :2824-2831
[7]  
Begg C.B., 1994, HDB RES SYNTHESIS, P399
[8]   Soil biota can change after exotic plant invasion: does this affect ecosystem processes? [J].
Belnap, J ;
Phillips, SL ;
Sherrod, SK ;
Moldenke, A .
ECOLOGY, 2005, 86 (11) :3007-3017
[9]   Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach [J].
Bever, JD ;
Westover, KM ;
Antonovics, J .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1997, 85 (05) :561-573
[10]   Soil community feedback and the coexistence of competitors: conceptual frameworks and empirical tests [J].
Bever, JD .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2003, 157 (03) :465-473