An experimental study of behavioural group size effects in tammar wallabies, Macropus eugenii

被引:71
作者
Blumstein, DT [1 ]
Evans, CS
Daniel, JC
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Dept Biol, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[2] Macquarie Univ, Dept Psychol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Macquarie Univ, Cooperat Res Ctr Conservat & Management Marsupial, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/anbe.1999.1156
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
As animals aggregate with others, the time they allot to social and nonsocial activities changes. Antipredator models of vigilance and foraging group size effects both predict a nonlinear relationship between group size and the time allocated to behaviour. Group size effects were experimentally studied in captive adult female tammar wallabies, a small macropodid marsupial, by increasing group size from 1 to 10. Tammars foraged more, looked less, groomed more, engaged in more aggressive interactions and moved about less as group size increased. Nonlinear regression models explained more variation in the time allocated to foraging, looking, locomotion and affiliative behaviour than linear models. Variation in self-grooming and aggression was better explained by linear models. Wallabies lay down significantly more, and walked significantly less, as group size increased: these relationships were significantly nonlinear. Thus, changes in perceived predation risk, which are characterized by nonlinear relationships, explain tammar wallaby group size effects for most activities. These results support the assertion that predation has played an important role in macropodid social evolution. Moreover, the findings suggest that conservation biologists should pay particular attention to group size when translocating or reintroducing endangered macropodids. (C) 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 360
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Alexander R.D., 1974, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V5, P325, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545
[2]  
[Anonymous], KANGAROOS WALLABIES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, BIOTROPICA, DOI DOI 10.1111/btp.12499
[4]  
BAKEMAN R, 1986, OBSERVING ITNERACTIO
[5]  
BARASH DP, 1973, ANIM BEHAV MONOGR, V6, P173
[6]   The effect of group size on vigilance and feeding rate in spice finches (Lonchura punctulata) [J].
Beauchamp, G ;
Livoreil, B .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1997, 75 (09) :1526-1531
[7]   Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance [J].
Bednekoff, PA ;
Lima, SL .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1998, 13 (07) :284-287
[8]   VIGILANCE AND GROUP-SIZE IN OSTRICHES [J].
BERTRAM, BCR .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1980, 28 (FEB) :278-286
[9]  
Blumstein DT, 1998, ETHOLOGY, V104, P501
[10]  
Byers J.A., 1997, American pronghorn: social adaptations and the ghosts of predators past